Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
An explorative time-elapsed μCT-based cadaveric study on humeral stem stability in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Dermot O'Rourke1, Xiaolong Fan2, Ashish Gupta3
1ARC ITTC for Joint Biomechanics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research, Brisbane, Australia; School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
None:
Higher complication rates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty are commonly reported in patients receiving smaller humeral implants, potentially due to reduced bone stock and compromised implant stability. While bone-preserving hybrid onlay-Grammont humeral stems are thought to improve cortical engagement, comparative biomechanical evidence remains scarce, particularly in small humeri. A 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted in this exploratory study to evaluate the independent effects of implant size (large vs. small humerus) and implant placement (inlay vs. hybrid onlay-Grammont) on implant stability. Paired humeri from a male (large) and female (small) donor were implanted with inlay and hybrid onlay-Grammont designs. Specimens were tested under controlled physiological and compressive failure loading in a custom-built μCT-compatible rig. Implant stiffness, vertical displacement, and cortical failure were quantified using 3D μCT imaging and force-displacement data. Rigid co-registration and surface mesh segmentation were used to assess implant migration and bone deformation. In the large humerus, the hybrid onlay-Grammont implant showed greater stiffness (288 N/mm) and failure load (2800 N) than the inlay design, consistently causing cortical opening. In the small humerus, the inlay implant exhibited the highest distal migration (-12 mm) without cortical cracking, while the onlay design produced controlled radial cortical failure consistent with the large specimen. These results demonstrate that reduced peri-prosthetic bone stock can prevent the implant from fully loading the cortex causing a shift of the failure mechanism, particularly in the small humerus. They also support further larger studies on patient, surgical, and loading factors concerning implant stability.

