Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026
Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats
Published on: October 23, 2020
An interpretable machine learning model for detecting vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy among patients with
1Department of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Background:
Vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) is a severe complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), particularly prevalent in patients with prolonged disease duration, poor glycemic control, and systemic comorbidities. This condition frequently progresses asymptomatically toward irreversible blindness without timely intervention. The early identification of VTDR is challenging due to the lack of validated biomarkers and a reliance on subjective clinical assessments. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to detect VTDR among patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR).
Methods:
Retrospective clinical data from T2DM patients with DR were extracted from the electronic medical records at our hospital and categorized into VTDR and non-VTDR (defined as mild-to-moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy) groups. The dataset was partitioned into training and testing sets (7:3 ratio). Eight ML models were trained and evaluated using metrics such as Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, and recall. Model performance was evaluated using a comprehensive scoring system (total score = 64). Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret the best-performing model. A web-based application was developed to demonstrate potential clinical utility.
Results:
Among 1,124 enrolled patients, the prevalence of VTDR was 36.9%. Key associated factors included diabetic treatment, T2DM duration, glycated hemoglobin levels, albuminuria, and anemia. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model demonstrated superior performance, with an AUC of 0.879, accuracy of 0.837, precision of 0.833, Brier score of 0.129, and an F1 score of 0.756, outperforming the other ML models. The SVM model achieved the highest total score (57/64) in the testing cohort. Furthermore, decision curve analysis and calibration curves confirmed the robustness and reliability of the models. A simplified calculator derived from the SHAP feature importance rankings maintained strong diagnostic capacity.
Conclusion:
The interpretable SVM model effectively detected VTDR among patients with DR using routine clinical data. While requiring external validation, this study serves as a proof-of-concept for a cost-effective screening tool that could assist clinicians in prioritizing high-risk patients and facilitating early intervention to prevent irreversible vision impairment.
