Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Investigating Long-Distance Transport of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Wheat via a Split-Root Exposure Technique
Published on: September 28, 2022
Evaluation and Comparison of Three Common Methods for PFAS Extraction from Soybean Tissues
Madhav Kharel1, Yuwei Zuo1, Weilan Zhang1
1Department of Environmental & Sustainable Engineering, University at Albany State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222, United States.
EPA Method 1633 is the top choice for extracting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from soybean tissues, especially at low environmental levels. The MTBE-NaOH method is best for highly contaminated samples needing isotopic correction.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Food Safety Science
Background:
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental contaminants with potential risks to agricultural and food safety.
- Accurate extraction of PFAS from plant matrices is crucial for reliable risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of three methods (MTBE-NaOH, EPA Method 1633, FDA CAM Method C-010.03) for extracting PFAS from soybean tissues.
- To identify the most suitable method for routine PFAS analysis in plant samples at various concentrations.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of methyl tert-butyl ether-sodium hydroxide (MTBE-NaOH) method.
- Assessment of EPA Method 1633.
- Analysis using U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Chemical Analytical Manual (CAM) Method C-010.03.
- Comparison of extraction efficiency, reproducibility, and cost.
Main Results:
- EPA Method 1633 demonstrated superior and reproducible extraction recoveries, particularly at low PFAS concentrations.
- At high PFAS concentrations, EPA Method 1633 remained consistently reliable.
- Cost analysis supported EPA Method 1633 and MTBE-NaOH for plant tissue analysis.
Conclusions:
- EPA Method 1633 is recommended as the default method for routine PFAS analysis in plant tissues at typical environmental levels.
- MTBE-NaOH method is preferred for highly contaminated samples requiring accurate isotopic correction.
- Findings enhance understanding of PFAS in edible crops, aiding risk assessment and food safety.
More Related Videos
10:24Author Spotlight: Quantification of Aflatoxins and Phytoalexins in Peanut Seeds to Identify Genetic Resistance Against Aspergillus
Published on: April 19, 2024
09:04Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
Published on: April 18, 2019