Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extending the Private Equity Conversation in Aesthetic Surgery.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2026
Same author

Spotlight in Plastic Surgery: July 2026.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Preoperative and Intraoperative Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Stratified Analysis Using 2011-2023 ACS-NSQIP Datasets.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

Gaps in Nutrition and Exercise Counseling Preparedness among Plastic Surgery Trainees: A Nationwide Exploratory Survey Study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

"Immediate Free Nipple Grafting with Autologous Breast Reconstruction for Large and/or Ptotic Breasts: Preserving the "Nipple-Sparing" Option".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

A novel, survey-based validated grading system for implant rippling in breast reconstruction.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same journal

Plant Exosome Injection with or without Low Level Laser Therapy Promotes Skin Wound Healing: An Experimental Study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Postoperative Outcomes of Absorbable versus Nonabsorbable Sutures in Trigger Finger Release Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Comparative Analysis of Electrocautery Versus LigaSure Energy-based Device for Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap Dissection.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

A Novel Classification of the Modified Cross-finger Flap for the Repair of Fingertip Defects.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Effect of Prior Abdominal Surgery on Abdominal-based Free-flap Breast Reconstruction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Rib Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Autologous, Fresh-frozen, and Irradiated Cartilage.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K

The Residency Applicant Numeric Key Tool for Structured Comparison Across Plastic Surgery Programs.

Ambika Menon1, Albert Losken1, Orr Shauly1

  • 1From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|March 20, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Plastic surgery residency applicants can now objectively compare programs using the Residency Applicant Numeric Key (RANK) tool. This standardized framework aids in creating a more informed and less subjective program rank list.

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Training
  • Residency Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Plastic surgery residency applicants often rely on subjective assessments for program ranking.
  • Existing applicant evaluation methods lack standardization, leading to inconsistent and emotionally influenced decisions.
  • An objective framework is needed to help applicants make informed ranking choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the Residency Applicant Numeric Key (RANK) tool.
  • To standardize the program evaluation process for plastic surgery residency applicants.
  • To provide a structured approach for objective comparison of residency programs.

Main Methods:

  • The RANK tool employs a head-to-head scoring system for program comparison.
  • Applicants rate programs across 10 domains (e.g., case volume, culture, research) on a 1-5 scale.
  • Domain scores are aggregated to produce an overall score for numerical comparison.

Main Results:

  • The RANK tool facilitates direct numerical comparison and organized ranking of programs.
  • It offers a consistent structure for objective, side-by-side program evaluation.
  • The tool allows for individualized priorities through domain selection and weighting.

Conclusions:

  • The RANK tool standardizes plastic surgery residency program evaluation.
  • It promotes objective decision-making for applicant rank lists.
  • This framework supports informed choices by balancing program attributes and personal priorities.