Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Open science practices in behavioral addictions: An exploratory survey.
Charlotte Eben1,2, Robert M Heirene3, Lucas Palmer1
11Centre for Gambling Research at UBC, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Behavioral addictions researchers show positive attitudes towards open science, with preregistration and data sharing being common. Early career researchers value these practices more but share concerns about knowledge gaps, while established researchers cite workload and lack of incentives.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Addiction Research
- Open Science Practices
- Scientific Integrity
Background:
- Behavioral addictions (BA) research, encompassing areas like gaming and gambling, impacts public health policy.
- Concerns exist regarding the trustworthiness of BA research due to potential underutilization of open science practices.
- This study investigates the adoption, motivations, concerns, and support needs for open science among BA researchers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the current landscape of open science practices within the field of behavioral addictions research.
- To identify the factors influencing the adoption of open science, including researcher motivations and perceived barriers.
- To understand the specific support needs for implementing open science practices effectively.
Main Methods:
- An exploratory survey was distributed via professional networks, conferences, and social media.
- 83 eligible responses were collected, including 41 from early career researchers (ECRs).
- The survey assessed general use, frequency, importance, engagement, concerns, and support needs related to seven open science practices.
Main Results:
- Most respondents expressed positive attitudes towards open science; preregistration (75%) and data sharing (65%) were most frequently adopted.
- ECRs attached greater importance to open science practices than established researchers, indicating a potential generational shift.
- ECRs' concerns focused on knowledge gaps and fear of errors, while established researchers cited workload and lack of incentives; both groups desired more time, resources, institutional support, and training.
Conclusions:
- Findings provide initial insights into open science perceptions and practices in BA research, despite descriptive limitations.
- Coordinated efforts from researchers, institutions, and professional societies are crucial for widespread and equitable adoption.
- Enhancing knowledge transfer and incentives is essential for sustained progress in open science within the field.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...

