Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Therapeutic Efficacy of Moving Cupping Along Meridians for Acute Exacerbation of COPD
Published on: September 27, 2024
The sliding cupping therapy as an alternative strategy for treating plaque psoriasis: A randomized controlled trial
1Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu, China.
Background:
The sliding cupping therapy represents a traditional Chinese medicine therapy and receives much appreciation for treating plaque psoriasis. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that sliding cupping therapy is non-inferior to narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB) therapy in improving disease severity in patients with plaque psoriasis.
Methods:
This prospective study recruited 60 patients with plaque psoriasis who were randomized to receive either sliding cupping intervention or NBUVB treatment. The cup was moved 30 times for each skin lesion until the target skin area turned purple. The initial dose (mJ/cm2) of ultraviolet radiation b (UVB) was determined based on sun-reactive skin types I through VI, which ranged from 300 mJ/cm2 to 800 mJ/cm2. Both treatments were performed 3 times per week for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 8, with secondary endpoints, including Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), body surface area, visual analogue scale scores, and quality of life measures.
Results:
The total response rates were 69.23% (18/26) and 79.17% (19/24) for patients receiving sliding cupping intervention and those receiving NBUVB treatment, respectively, which showed no significant difference (P = .526). The PASI scores, body surface area, and PGA were reduced in patients with plaque psoriasis at W0, W4 and W8 after either sliding cupping intervention or NBUVB treatment (P <.001), and these reductions were not significantly different between the patients receiving sliding cupping intervention and those receiving NBUVB treatment at W0, W4, W8, and W12. At W8, the mean percentage reduction in PASI was 62.4% (95% CI, 54.9-69.8) in the sliding cupping group and 66.9% (95% CI, 59.6-74.2) in the NBUVB group, with no significant difference between groups. The total response rates were 69.23% (18/26) and 79.17% (19/24), respectively (P = .526). Patients receiving sliding cupping intervention and those receiving NBUVB treatment did not show statistically significant differences in these outcomes at W0, W4, W8, and W12 (P >.05).
Conclusion:
The overall results suggest that sliding cupping therapy exhibits statistically similar efficacy and safety profiles as NBUVB treatment, especially at 8 weeks after treatment.
