Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

Polarization of M1 and M2 Human Monocyte-Derived Cells and Analysis with Flow Cytometry upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection
Published on: September 18, 2020
Immunological and Hematological Characterisation of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (M. Tb) Infected Patients
Mariam Ahmed Mujtaba1,2, Hira Shahzad2, Muhammad Ishaq Javed2
1Department of Biotechnology, Women University Mardan, East Canal Road, Mardan, Pakistan.
Introduction:
Differentiating TB phenotypes remains a diagnostic challenge due to the absence of a universally accepted standard test. Although the interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) is recommended for Latent TB Infection (LTBI), its application varies across clinical settings. This study utilized IGRA to immunologically categorize subclinical individuals and compare hematological parameters, including the complete blood count (CBC) and differential leukocyte count (DLC) among subclinical, clinical, and cured individuals to assess their diagnostic utility.
Methods:
IGRA was performed to differentiate TB phenotypes. Demographic data, CBC, and DLC values were recorded. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for intergroup comparisons. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the diagnostic performance of significant markers.
Results:
IGRA stratified subclinical individuals into LTBI (13.2%) and healthy controls (HC; 86.8%). RBC and TLC were elevated, while platelet counts were reduced in active TB (ATB) compared with HC and LTBI (p <0.0001). Neutrophils and ESR were significantly elevated in ATB and TB-cured (TB-CU) groups. Monocyte counts were lower in ATB than in other phenotypes. ROC analysis showed good predictive value for neutrophils (AUC 0.845), ESR (AUC 0.844), and monocytes (AUC up to 0.814). NLR exhibited strong discriminatory power (AUC>0.83, adjusted OR=1.59).
Discussion:
The results highlight the potential of hematological markers, particularly NLR and ESR, in distinguishing TB phenotypes. While promising, the findings are limited by smaller sample sizes in the LTBI and TB-CU groups and the absence of IGRA in TB-CU individuals.
Conclusion:
CBC and DLC parameters vary across TB phenotypes. NLR, neutrophils, ESR, and monocytes show potential as supportive diagnostic tools. Further longitudinal studies are warranted.
More Related Videos
10:10A 3D Human Lung Tissue Model for Functional Studies on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection
Published on: October 5, 2015
09:02An Experimental Model to Study Tuberculosis-Malaria Coinfection upon Natural Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Plasmodium berghei
Published on: February 17, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...