Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Characterization and Application of Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water
Published on: August 3, 2016
Calibration and field validation data to support a simple yet robust implementation of passive sampling methods for
Emmanuel Schaad1, Nicolas Estoppey2, Aurea C Chiaia-Hernández1
1Institute of Geography and Oeschger Centre of Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
None:
Passive sampling offers a promising approach for assessing contaminants in surface waters; however, its broader adoption is limited by the need for standardized and user-friendly implementation methods and the availability of suitable sorbents. This study investigates the performance of the widely used Empore™ SDB-RPS disk and two potential alternative sorbent phases-Affinisep AttractSPE® HLB (AHLB) and Biotage Atlantic® HLB-L (BHLB)-for the uptake of >100 pesticides with diverse physicochemical properties (logKOW = -2 to 5, pKa = -3.15 to 12.58) and compares them against the Empore SDB-RPS disk. The passive sampler (PS) performance was evaluated under controlled laboratory settings using a flow system at environmentally relevant conditions (21 cm/s, 300 ng/L, 2-week exposure) and an established open-source stainless-steel housing. Diffusive transport characteristics were assessed by determining relative resistances of the water boundary layer and the sorbent to the mass transfer, with average sorbent resistance (1/Rs, tot) contributions ranging from 39% and 40% (AHLB and SDB-RPS) to 87% (BHLB). Performance under field conditions was assessed through a 2-week calibration alongside active sampling in an agricultural stream (22-40 cm/s). Pesticide accumulation was linear to curvilinear (monotonically increasing) for all PSs, despite uptake being partially (AHLB and SDB-RPS) or almost completely (BHLB) controlled by the sorbent. The uptake of pesticides to all PSs could be well described by a simple first-order uptake model as opposed to more complex approaches, such as incorporating fluctuating water concentrations or diffusion models. Laboratory sampling rates (Rs) could be determined for 78% of pesticides. Comparable results were observed for AHLB (Rs average = 0.42 ± 0.24 L/day) and SDB-RPS (Rs average = 0.41 ± 0.27 L/day), whereas BHLB showed lower rates (on average, a factor of 5 lower). Field evaluations confirmed the similar capabilities of AHLB to SDB-RPS, detecting ≥43 of the studied pesticides, while BHLB detected fewer (29 pesticides), likely due to its fiberglass structure acting as additional resistance. For all sorbents and compounds with available sampling rates (>50% of detected compounds in the field), time-weighted average concentrations derived from PS closely matched active sampling measurements between 0.5 and 2.5 times, supporting their reliability for pesticide quantification. Overall, this study provides recoveries, sampling rates, and sampler-water partition coefficients (Ksw) for three PSs for a range of pesticides. This work helps to facilitate the broader adoption of passive sampling techniques for regulatory and environmental analysis.
More Related Videos
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
10:05Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation
Published on: July 4, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...