Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Morphologies01:29

Microbial Morphologies

4.8K
Bacterial and archaeal cells exhibit remarkable diversity in shape and structure, critical in their adaptability and functionality. Among bacteria, the most commonly observed shapes include cocci and bacilli. Cocci are spherical and may exist singly or in groupings such as pairs (diplococci), chains (streptococci), clusters (staphylococci), or tetrads. Bacilli, in contrast, are rod-shaped and can also occur as single cells, in pairs, or chains, depending on their environmental and genetic...
4.8K
Morphogenesis02:19

Morphogenesis

30.8K
Plant morphogenesis—the development of a plant’s form and structure—involves several overlapping developmental processes, including growth and cell differentiation. Precursor cells differentiate into specific cell types, which are organized into the tissues and organ systems that make up the functional plant.
30.8K
Evolution of New Traits in Microbes01:24

Evolution of New Traits in Microbes

24
Microorganisms evolve rapidly due to their large population sizes and short generation times, often exhibiting measurable changes within days under laboratory conditions. Natural selection acts on standing genetic variation, enabling the retention and amplification of beneficial traits that confer fitness advantages in changing environments.Adaptive Pigment Regulation in RhodobacterIn Rhodobacter, a genus of purple non-sulfur bacteria, light-harvesting pigments such as bacteriochlorophyll and...
24
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

35.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.8K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

46.2K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.2K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

8.4K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
8.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Co-option of lysosomal machinery shapes the evolution of the intracellular photosymbiosis supporting coral reefs.

Cell·2026
Same author

Symbiont identity impacts prokaryotic microbiome dynamics during heat stress in a model system for corals.

Integrative and comparative biology·2026
Same author

A stretch-responsive fibroblast program promotes epidermal stem cell self-renewal during skin expansion.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Addressing multidrug-resistant bacterial infections with iridium-based theragnostic agents.

RSC medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Tissue rigidity phase transition shapes morphogen gradients.

Nature cell biology·2026
Same author

Morphological control of gut lumen access shapes enteroendoceine cell function.

The Journal of cell biology·2026
Same journal

LEF1 and niche factors determine T cell stemness across chronic diseases.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Recurrent patterns of TOP1-mediated neuronal genomic damage shared by major neurodegenerative disorders.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Four-dimensional molecular mapping from a spatial snapshot reveals the dynamics of hair follicle organogenesis.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Whole-cell particle-based digital twin simulations from 4D lattice light-sheet microscopy data.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Systematic discovery of pathogen effector functions across human pathogens and pathways.

Cell·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.5K

Deciphering mechanical determinants of morphological evolution.

Richard Bailleul1, Nicolas Cuny2, Diana Khoromskaia3

  • 1Developmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany; Laboratoire de Physique de l'École normale supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, 75005 Paris, France; Institut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, INSERM, 75005 Paris, France.

Cell
|March 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biomechanical variations in tissue forces drive diverse cnidarian larval shapes. A new mesoscale mechanical framework reveals how specific module configurations, or mechanotypes, explain species-specific forms.

Keywords:
active mattercnidarian planulaeevo-devomechanobiologymechanotypemesoscale dynamicsmorphogenesisshape evolutiontheoretical modelingtissue mechanics

More Related Videos

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

8.0K
Probing the Roles of Physical Forces in Early Chick Embryonic Morphogenesis
06:33

Probing the Roles of Physical Forces in Early Chick Embryonic Morphogenesis

Published on: June 5, 2018

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 23, 2026

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.5K
Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

8.0K
Probing the Roles of Physical Forces in Early Chick Embryonic Morphogenesis
06:33

Probing the Roles of Physical Forces in Early Chick Embryonic Morphogenesis

Published on: June 5, 2018

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Biophysics
  • Evolutionary Morphology

Background:

  • Understanding the evolution of biological form requires identifying the mechanical underpinnings of morphological diversity.
  • While biomechanical forces are known to shape tissues, the specific variations in force-generating systems across species that lead to diverse forms remain largely unknown.
  • Cnidarians, with their deep evolutionary divergence, offer a valuable model system to investigate the origins of morphological variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the mechanical basis of larval shape diversity across six cnidarian species.
  • To develop a quantitative framework for comparing morphological variation based on biomechanical principles.
  • To understand how variations in tissue-scale mechanical parameters generate diverse organismal forms.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative morphogenesis across six cnidarian species.
  • Application of active matter theory to analyze tissue mechanics.
  • Definition and analysis of species-specific mechanical modules (mechanotypes).
  • Interspecies perturbations to assess the role of regulatory differences in morphology.

Main Results:

  • Species-specific configurations of mechanical modules, termed mechanotypes, were defined and quantitatively predict larval shapes.
  • Shape elongation was identified as a simple trait dependent on one mechanical module, while shape polarity is a complex trait involving multiple modules.
  • Simulated interspecies regulatory differences reprogrammed larval morphology, producing forms resembling sister species.

Conclusions:

  • A mesoscale mechanical framework was established for cross-species comparison of morphology.
  • Variations in a limited set of tissue-scale parameters can generate significant morphological diversity.
  • This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how biomechanical processes contribute to evolutionary diversification.