Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

3D Whole-heart Myocardial Tissue Analysis
Published on: April 12, 2017
Interactive deep learning for myocardial scar segmentation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Aida Moafi1, Danial Moafi2, Simran Shergill1
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Background:
Following myocardial infarction, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a reliable metric for risk stratification and therapeutic planning. However, conventional segmentation methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, with high inter-observer variability and inconsistent performance in routine clinical practice. This study sought to develop an interactive deep learning system for scar segmentation and quantification.
Methods:
The framework was developed and evaluated using LGE-CMR images from 348 patients with chronic myocardial infarction (244 training, 51 validation, and 53 test). The model incorporates prompt-guided segmentation and leverages a vision foundation model adapted for medical imaging, integrated into a clinician-facing interface for real-time interaction, and automated quantification. Training used a composite loss function combining Dice overlap, voxel-wise cross-entropy, and Kullback-Leibler divergence against soft labels to address annotation uncertainty. Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using expert manual annotations as the reference standard, with assessment of segmentation accuracy, repeatability, and agreement with the conventional full-width at half-maximum method (FWHM).
Results:
The framework achieved expert-level segmentation performance on the test set (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.74 ± 0.10; Hausdorff distance = 5.87 ± 6.79 mm) with a median scar mass error of 1.28 g (interquartile range [IQR] 0.74-2.34), corresponding to 1.4% (IQR 0.81-2.47) of left ventricular mass. Repeatability analysis (n = 41) demonstrated excellent agreement, with both inter- and intra-observer concordance correlation coefficients of 0.999 (compared with 0.737 and 0.952, respectively, for the conventional FWHM). Segmentation time was substantially reduced when using the interactive tool compared with the conventional workflow, averaging 65 ± 34 s per patient. Performance and repeatability remained high across the test set with differing levels of image quality.
Conclusion:
The proposed framework for scar segmentation with a human-in-the-loop design enables fast, accurate, and highly reproducible myocardial scar quantification from LGE-CMR. This may provide more consistent performance in routine clinical workflows.

