Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Biosensors01:17

Microbial Biosensors

17
Microbial biosensors are analytical devices that utilize living microbes to detect specific substances through measurable signals. These devices consist of two main components: biosensing organisms and signal-transducing elements. Biosensing organisms, such as Escherichia coli or Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are typically housed in multiwell plates connected to transducers, enabling rapid, real-time detection of target analytes.Signal Generation MechanismWhen a target analyte—such as...
17

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in Latin America: A systematic review of 575 cases.

Revista iberoamericana de micologia·2026
Same author

Effect of Quinolone Prophylaxis Discontinuation During Pre-engraftment Neutropenia on Incidence, Mortality, and Etiology of Bloodstream Infections in Hematopoietic Stem-cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Open forum infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Infective endocarditis in the real world: Diagnostic challenges and predictors of in-hospital mortality in a 10-year retrospective cohort from a Brazilian tertiary center.

Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo·2026
Same author

Is candidemia mortality inevitable or a consequence of inadequate guideline adherence?

The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases·2026
Same author

Host mitochondrial apoptotic signatures in children with chronic conditions reveal viral modulation of MCL-1 in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Molecular biology reports·2026
Same author

Admission status is not destiny: serial surveillance reveals ecologic and in-hospital drivers of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales colonization in critical care.

The Journal of hospital infection·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots
11:11

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots

Published on: February 11, 2022

5.2K

Noninvasive SARS-CoV-2 detection using a low-cost electronic nose.

Gabriel Fialkovitz1, Pedro Lobo Sousa2, Amanda Miyuki Hidifira3

  • 1Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Infectologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Unidade de Controle de Infecção Hospitalar, Instituto do Coração (InCor), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
|March 22, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A novel electronic nose detects SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) noninvasively using saliva or breath. This rapid, low-cost diagnostic tool shows promising accuracy for point-of-care testing.

Keywords:
COVID-19Electronic noseNoninvasive detectionSARS-CoV-2

More Related Videos

On-site DNA Detection of Trypanosomatid Parasites and Nosema ceranae Through Alkaline Lysis Coupled to RPA/CRISPR/Cas12a System
07:46

On-site DNA Detection of Trypanosomatid Parasites and Nosema ceranae Through Alkaline Lysis Coupled to RPA/CRISPR/Cas12a System

Published on: July 18, 2025

1.1K
Optical Detection of E. coli Bacteria by Mesoporous Silicon Biosensors
07:22

Optical Detection of E. coli Bacteria by Mesoporous Silicon Biosensors

Published on: November 20, 2013

17.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots
11:11

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots

Published on: February 11, 2022

5.2K
On-site DNA Detection of Trypanosomatid Parasites and Nosema ceranae Through Alkaline Lysis Coupled to RPA/CRISPR/Cas12a System
07:46

On-site DNA Detection of Trypanosomatid Parasites and Nosema ceranae Through Alkaline Lysis Coupled to RPA/CRISPR/Cas12a System

Published on: July 18, 2025

1.1K
Optical Detection of E. coli Bacteria by Mesoporous Silicon Biosensors
07:22

Optical Detection of E. coli Bacteria by Mesoporous Silicon Biosensors

Published on: November 20, 2013

17.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Infectious Disease Diagnostics
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for improved SARS-CoV-2 detection methods.
  • Existing diagnostic tests can be invasive, slow, or lack accuracy in early stages.
  • Noninvasive, rapid, and accurate point-of-care diagnostics are crucial for pandemic response.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a noninvasive electronic nose for rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection.
  • To assess the performance of volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis in saliva and exhaled breath for identifying infection.
  • To compare the efficacy of various machine learning algorithms for classifying SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative samples.

Main Methods:

  • An electronic nose composed of an array of metal-oxide gas sensors was utilized.
  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from saliva and exhaled breath samples were analyzed.
  • Machine learning algorithms, including KNN, SVM, NN, and Random Forest, were employed for sample classification.

Main Results:

  • The electronic nose achieved accuracy rates of 76%-89% for exhaled breath and 75%-86% for saliva samples.
  • The K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithm demonstrated optimal performance.
  • KNN yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.895 for exhaled breath and 0.861 for saliva.

Conclusions:

  • The study demonstrates the feasibility of using a low-cost electronic nose for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
  • This noninvasive approach shows potential for rapid, accurate point-of-care diagnostics.
  • Further validation in real-world clinical settings is supported by these proof-of-concept results.