Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Fast Science, Slow Evaluation: What Makes Health Technology Assessment of Genetic and Genomic Technologies So
Valentina Baccolini1, Leonardo Maria Siena2, Claudia Isonne2
1Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Objectives:
The implementation of new applications into healthcare systems and practices frequently relies on health technology assessment (HTA). Given their complexity, HTA of genetic and genomic technologies (GGTs) faces multiple challenges; yet, no comprehensive synthesis exists. We systematically reviewed and summarized HTA challenges for GGTs, overall and by HTA domain.
Methods:
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched 3 databases (OSF protocol h4qg2). Eligible studies primarily discussed HTA challenges/barriers for GGTs across any HTA domain. Issues were classified into 9 EUnetHTA's Core Model domains plus a "framework" category. Results were synthesized narratively.
Results:
Twenty records published between 2007 and 2025 were included: heterogeneous in structure, most discussed multiple HTA domains, and some reported suggestions. Economic (n = 12), clinical (n = 9), and social (n = 8) considerations predominated, whereas safety and organizational aspects were underrepresented. Across domains, we identified a persistent mismatch between the rapid evolution of GGTs and the slower generation of evidence, along with insufficient standardization and validation of key procedures that hinder cross-study comparability. Other major issues included defining clear healthcare pathways, valuing genomic testing, and strengthening regulatory frameworks to protect patient rights, data integrity, and equity of access. Suggested remedies were adopting living/rapid HTA, defining core outcome sets, harnessing real-world data sources, standardizing guidelines, engaging stakeholders, and enhancing national commitment.
Conclusions:
Fast-moving science and inadequate methods hamper HTA of GGTs. Adopting flexible HTA methods, standardized outcomes and procedures, and multistakeholder engagement, supported by national infrastructures, can shift HTA toward a more agile, resource-enabled system that better supports timely, generalizable, and equitable decision making in genomics.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: Overview
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
What is Genetic Engineering?
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Genomics

