Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

06:49
Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
Published on: January 10, 2014
28.3K
Real-time processing of misinformation and its correction: Insights from eye movements during reading
Roslyn Wong1, Lili Yu2, Aaron Veldre3
1School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. roslyn.wong@mq.edu.au.
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
|March 23, 2026
Summary
Even after retraction, people believe misinformation due to the continued-influence effect (CIE). This study used eye-tracking to find real-time indicators of susceptibility, showing cognitive abilities and correction methods impact belief persistence.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Information Science
- Media Studies
Background:
- Misinformation, once encountered, can persist despite retractions, a phenomenon known as the continued-influence effect (CIE).
- Understanding real-time cognitive processes underlying susceptibility to misinformation is crucial for developing effective countermeasures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate real-time indicators of misinformation susceptibility using eye-tracking.
- To examine the influence of individual differences (reading proficiency, working memory) on the CIE.
- To assess the effectiveness of different correction strategies.
Main Methods:
- Eye movements of 74 participants were recorded while reading newspaper-style articles with retracted or non-retracted information.
- Post-reading questionnaires assessed memory and inferential judgments.
- Individual differences in language proficiency and working memory were evaluated.
Main Results:
- Retractions increased processing effort for corrective information and reduced re-reading of non-causal details.
- Reminders of misinformation led to faster reading speeds.
- Higher reading proficiency correlated with reduced susceptibility; reading proficiency and working memory aided real-time processing.
- Longer reading times and slower speeds were tentatively linked to reduced susceptibility without explicit reminders.
Conclusions:
- Misinformation susceptibility is influenced by individual cognitive abilities.
- The effectiveness of corrections depends on factors like explicit reminders and cognitive processing.
- Eye-tracking provides valuable real-time insights into how individuals process and are affected by misinformation and its corrections.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
630
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
630
Understanding Deception
226
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
226

