Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Basic Positron Emission Tomography System Constructed to Locate a Radioactive Source in a Bi-dimensional Space
Published on: February 1, 2016
Improved random coincidence estimation including triple coincidence detection in PET.
Debora Niekämper1,2, Jürgen J Scheins1, Elisabeth Pfaehler1
1Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
This study developed a new method to accurately estimate random coincidences in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. The technique improves quantitative accuracy for both single and dual tracer imaging, crucial for precise medical diagnostics.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging Physics
- Nuclear Medicine Technology
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Background:
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging is challenged by random coincidences, where unrelated decay events are mistakenly identified as true coincidences.
- These misidentifications, particularly random triple coincidences, can introduce bias or reduce sensitivity in quantitative PET scans.
- Accurate correction is essential for reliable imaging of beta-plus (
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an accurate method for estimating random double and triple coincidences in PET.
- To improve quantitative accuracy in PET imaging, especially for
andβ + emitters.β + - γ - To evaluate the impact of random coincidences on true triple coincidences in dual-tracer PET and positronium lifetime imaging.
Main Methods:
- Developed coincidence identification schemes using veto intervals to separate double and triple coincidences.
- Employed extended delayed window techniques to estimate random coincidences, matching interval sizes for coincidence windows and vetoes.
- Validated the method using extensive simulations across various isotopes, scanner parameters, and phantom configurations, followed by experimental measurements on a brain PET scanner.
Main Results:
- The developed method achieved high accuracy in estimating random coincidences.
- Relative deviations were less than 3% for double coincidences and less than 5% for triple coincidences.
- Results were consistent for both
andβ + emitters across simulated and measured data.β + - γ
Conclusions:
- The proposed method provides an accurate and reliable approach for correcting random coincidences in PET.
- This advancement is crucial for enhancing the quantitative precision of PET imaging, particularly for complex tracer types.
- The findings support improved diagnostic capabilities through more accurate PET data analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Unusual Results
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors

