Visual Performance Comparison Between Enhanced Monofocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic
Danai Barpaki1,2, Diamantis Almaliotis1, Sofia Androudi3
1Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GRC.
This systematic review found no significant visual acuity difference between enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) after cataract surgery. Both enhanced monofocal and EDOF IOLs offer comparable distance vision outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
- Biomedical Engineering
- Clinical Research Methodology
Background:
- Cataract surgery commonly involves intraocular lens (IOL) implantation to restore vision.
- Enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs are advanced options offering improved visual outcomes.
- Direct comparison of these IOL types is crucial for guiding clinical decisions and patient selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare visual outcomes of enhanced monofocal versus EDOF intraocular lenses (IOLs) following cataract surgery.
- To assess differences in distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities, as well as subjective visual disturbances like glare and halo.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and ICTRP up to April 1, 2025.
- Inclusion of five studies (672 eyes) directly comparing enhanced monofocal (Tecnis Eyhance) with EDOF IOLs (Tecnis Symfony, Tecnis PureSee, Acrysof IQ Vivity).
- Risk of bias assessment using RoB 2 and JBI tools; random-effects meta-analysis for distance visual acuity.
Main Results:
- Meta-analysis revealed no significant clinical difference in uncorrected or corrected distance visual acuity between enhanced monofocal and EDOF IOLs.
- Individual study results for intermediate and near visual acuity, and subjective glare/halo perception were presented but not quantitatively synthesized due to heterogeneity.
- Quantitative synthesis for intermediate visual acuity was not feasible due to substantial heterogeneity (I² > 50%) across studies.
Conclusions:
- Enhanced monofocal and EDOF intraocular lenses provide comparable distance visual acuity outcomes after cataract surgery.
- Heterogeneity in EDOF designs and study types limits quantitative synthesis of intermediate/near vision and visual quality outcomes.
- Further research is warranted to clarify differences in visual performance beyond distance acuity, particularly for intermediate vision.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
