Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

555
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
555
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

127.4K
Overview
127.4K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

15.2K
15.2K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

820
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
820
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

38.7K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Sheep Placenta in the Treatment of Skin Disorders.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Low-Temperature Deposition of Polycrystalline ε-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> for Deep Ultraviolet Perceptual Photodetection.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Genomic analysis of <i>Botrytis cinerea</i> causing postharvest strawberry rot and the control effect of pydiflumetofen.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same author

Nonlinear Modeling Reveals Novel Associations Between Genetically Predicted Protein Levels and Pancreatic Cancer Risk.

Molecular carcinogenesis·2026
Same author

The impact of trust in AI on digital innovation examining the moderation of intellectual capital and task characteristics.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A predictive 14-gene signature and FLI1 inhibition overcome tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte dysfunction in triple-negative breast cancer.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Winner's Curse Free Robust Mendelian Randomization with Summary Data.

Zhongming Xie1, Wanheng Zhang2, Jingshen Wang1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
|March 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a robust Mendelian Randomization (MR) framework using summary data to overcome winner's curse and pleiotropy biases. The new method provides valid causal inference, enhancing genetic epidemiology research.

Keywords:
Bootstrap aggregationGWASPost-selection inference

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Mendelian Randomization (MR) uses genetic variants for causal inference from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data.
  • Classical MR methods are susceptible to biases from the winner's curse and pleiotropy.
  • Existing robust MR approaches have limitations in addressing these biases effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a unified robust Mendelian Randomization framework for causal inference using GWAS summary data.
  • To systematically address and mitigate biases caused by the winner's curse and pleiotropy.
  • To enable valid statistical inference on causal effects without stringent distributional assumptions on pleiotropic effects.

Main Methods:

  • A novel robust Mendelian Randomization framework is proposed.
  • The framework systematically removes winner's curse bias.
  • It screens out genetic instruments exhibiting pleiotropic effects.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework provides valid statistical inference for causal effects.
  • The estimator demonstrates convergence to a normal distribution with well-estimable variance under appropriate conditions.
  • Performance was validated through Monte Carlo simulations and two case studies.

Conclusions:

  • The developed MR framework offers a robust approach to causal inference from summary data.
  • It effectively addresses winner's curse and pleiotropy, improving the reliability of genetic epidemiology findings.
  • An R package, MRcare, is available for practical application of the method.