Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Peaceful coexistence or inevitable clash? Confronting the claims of science and religion about death
Ayse Payir1, Kathleen H Corriveau2, Paul L Harris3
1Department of Psychology, Union College, Schenectady, NY, United States.
Abstract:
Between September 26, 2022 and August 30, 2023, 5- to 12-year-old children and their parents (N = 258, 178 females, 1 nonbinary) from the U.S.A., judged conflicting scientific and religious claims with respect to death. Most secular participants endorsed the scientific claims and rejected the religious claims regardless of age, whereas most religious participants endorsed the religious claims and rejected the scientific claims, with this pattern becoming stronger with age. Nevertheless, dualistic explanations integrating both types of claims also increased with age regardless of religious background. Overall, when confronted with conflicting scientific and religious claims about death, most people endorse one claim over the other, depending on their background. The effort to reconcile both claims increases with age but never predominates.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Kubler Ross's Stages of Dying
In denial, individuals reject the reality of their condition, often thinking, "This isn't true; I feel fine," as a way to protect themselves from...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Overview of Cell Death
Cell death was observed in the early 19th century, but there was no experimental evidence to prove it. In 1842, Carl Vogt first discovered cell death in a metamorphic toad; however, it was not termed ‘cell death.’ Scientists discovered different cell death pathways only in the...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

