Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

07:01
3D Imaging of Soft-Tissue Samples using an X-ray Specific Staining Method and Nanoscopic Computed Tomography
Published on: October 24, 2019
10.4K
Criteria for selecting the Paganin-filter reconstruction parameter in X-ray phase-contrast tomography
Eduardo X Miqueles1, Everton L de Oliveira1, Murilo Carvalho1
1Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory, CNPEM, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
|March 23, 2026
Summary
This study introduces two novel methods to automatically optimize the Paganin filter parameter in X-ray computed tomography. This enhances image quality by balancing resolution and noise without subjective tuning.
Area of Science:
- Physics
- Materials Science
- Imaging Science
Background:
- The Paganin filter is crucial for phase-contrast X-ray computed tomography (CT) using synchrotron light.
- It corrects phase effects and reduces noise but relies on assumptions about sample properties (constant β/δ ratio).
- Empirical parameter selection often leads to suboptimal image quality in real-world samples.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a quantitative, noise-aware criterion for optimizing the Paganin filter parameter.
- To eliminate the need for subjective, empirical tuning of the filter parameter.
- To improve image quality in phase-contrast CT by automating parameter selection.
Main Methods:
- Method 1: Analyzes the noise power spectrum using a Fourier Ring Correlation (FRC) framework to balance resolution enhancement and noise amplification.
- Method 2: Examines reconstructed image variations with changing filter parameters to find an inflection point balancing noise suppression and smoothing.
- Both methods provide automated parameter selection for Paganin-filtered phase-contrast tomography data.
Main Results:
- Developed two distinct, quantitative methods for automated Paganin filter parameter selection.
- Method 1 establishes a theoretical lower bound on FRC for noise suppression and resolution.
- Method 2 identifies an inflection point for optimal noise-noise/smoothing balance.
Conclusions:
- Introduced objective criteria for selecting the Paganin filter parameter, overcoming limitations of empirical tuning.
- The proposed methods offer automated, near-optimal parameter selection for phase-contrast CT.
- This work enhances the reliability and efficiency of image analysis in phase-contrast tomography.

