Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
Published on: February 14, 2025
Growth Guidance Surgery: Factors Associated With Complications
William ElNemer1, Zaid Elsabbagh, Myung-Jin Cha
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Study Design:
Retrospective, multicenter cohort study.
Summary Of Background Data:
Growth guidance surgery (GGS) has lower reoperation rates and fewer episodes of care than other growth-sparing methods but is associated with instrumentation complications. This study aimed to characterize factors associated with implant complications in GGS.
Methods:
A multicenter early-onset scoliosis database was analyzed for patients who underwent GGS. Radiographs, complication reports, and reoperation notes were evaluated for instances of rod breakage, screw pullout, instrumentation prominence, skin breakdown over implants, patients outgrowing implants, and deep wound infection. Descriptive statistics, χ 2 test, and Cox proportional-hazards models were utilized to detect differences in complications.
Results:
One hundred eighteen patients [7±2 y old; 69 (58%) female] were included. Mean follow-up was 5 (±3) years. The 173 instances of instrumentation complications comprised 55 (32%) broken rods, 46 (27%) screw pullouts, 33 (19%) prominences, seven (4%) skin breakdown over implant, and 32 (18%) outgrowing the rods. There was a 2.46-fold ( P =0.039) increased risk of rod breakage for rod diameter ≤4.5 versus >4.5 mm. For lighter patients, odds were greater for screw pullout by 2.0-fold, for prominence by 3.1-fold, for skin breakdown over implant by 7.7-fold, and for deep wound infection by 3.6-fold compared with heavier patients (all P <0.05). Broken rods more often occurred within two vertebrae of the apex of deformity; screw pullouts near the upper or lowest instrumented vertebrae.
Conclusions:
Most instrumentation failures were broken rods and screw pullouts. Breakage was largely confined to the deformity apex and was mitigated by rods >4.5 mm; pullouts clustered at construct ends. Lighter ( i.e. mostly younger) patients faced higher risks of infection, prominence, and skin compromise. Using larger-diameter rods, ensuring robust proximal-distal fixation, and maximizing the muscle envelope may meaningfully reduce these complications and, thus, reoperations.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...

