Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Nivolumab versus Best Supportive Care after Failure of Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with ECOG
Pawan Kumar Singh1, Geetika Arya2, Vineela Surapaneni3
1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Pt. B.D. Sharma Post Graduate institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, India, ga.ps.complete@gmail.com; pawansingh.pgims@uhsr.ac.in.
Introduction:
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS >2) represent a challenging subset of patients. Best supportive care (BSC) has been the standard of care as per NCCN guidelines in this cohort; however, immune checkpoint inhibitors have the potential of offering better tolerance and survival benefits. This study aimed to compare outcomes of immunotherapy versus BSC in NSCLC patients with PS >2.
Methods:
This is a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients who have progressed on initial lines of therapy and had ECOG PS 3 or 4. A propensity score matching was conducted between the two groups, those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab group) and those who were managed with BSC (BSC group), using the variables of age, sex, smoking status, stage, and tumor type. The final study cohort included 39 patients in the nivolumab arm and 21 in the BSC arm. Baseline demographics, treatment responses, overall survival (OS), and adverse events were compared.
Results:
Most patients were males (81.7%), smokers (85%), and had stage IV disease (75%), and squamous histology (70%). Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) status was unknown in 53.3%. All patients had initially received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Compared to the nivolumab group, the BSC group had a higher proportion of ECOG 4 patients (80.9% vs. 35.9%, p < 0.001), while more nivolumab patients had PDL1 levels of 1-49% (30.8% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.003). Median progression-free survival in the nivolumab group was 18 weeks, with 25.6% remaining progression-free at data cutoff. Median OS was significantly longer with nivolumab: 29 weeks (95% CI: 11.3-46.7) versus 8 weeks (95% CI: 3.5-12.5; p < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.243 (95% CI: 0.106-0.56; p < 0.001). In the nivolumab group, 23.1% had partial responses, and 41% showed at least one-point improvement in PS (4.8% in the BSC group).
Conclusion:
Immunotherapy demonstrated superior survival outcomes and an acceptable tolerability profile than BSC in NSCLC patients with PS >2.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
