Safety, efficacy, and outcomes of the modified rotational atherectomy approach: A real-world single-center experience

Ravinder Singh Rao1, Kailash Chandra1, Govind Narayan Sharma1

  • 1Department of Cardiology, RHL Rajasthan Hospital, Milap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Indian Heart Journal
|March 23, 2026
PubMed

Insights

This study shows a modified rotational atherectomy (RA) approach safely treats calcified coronary lesions in India. The modified RA technique, using slow burr speed and pretreatment medications, achieved high procedural success and minimized complications.

Area of Science:

  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Rotational atherectomy (RA) effectively ablates calcified coronary plaques, aiding stent expansion.
  • However, RA carries risks including coronary perforation, dissection, and slow/no-reflow.
  • Optimizing RA safety and outcomes in diverse patient populations remains crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the safety and periprocedural outcomes of a modified RA approach in Indian patients.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of specific techniques in reducing RA-associated complications.

Main Methods:

  • A 6-year retrospective study of 320 patients undergoing modified RA at an Indian tertiary care institution.
  • The modified approach involved slow burr speed (150,000-155,000 rpm), short runs, and pretreatment with adrenaline and aminophylline to avoid temporary pacemakers (TPM).
  • Data collected included demographics, procedural details, and complications; primary endpoint was angiographic and procedural success.

Main Results:

  • The study included predominantly male patients (80.31%) with high rates of acute coronary syndrome (67.81%), diabetes (50.93%), and hypertension (67.81%).
  • A total of 322 RA procedures on 414 lesions were performed, including chronic total occlusions and left main coronary artery lesions.
  • Procedural success was high (96.90%), with low complication rates: slow/no-reflow (1.24%), dissection (1.24%), and burr entrapment (0.62%). TPM was needed in only one patient (0.31%).

Conclusions:

  • A modified RA technique, incorporating slow burr speed, short runs, and specific pretreatment, can be safely performed in an Indian setting.
  • This approach effectively avoids the need for temporary pacemakers and reduces the incidence of slow/no-reflow.
  • Small burr sizes, slow rotation speeds, and short runs are critical for safe and effective calcium ablation using RA.
Abstract