Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
Developing a leadership competency model for Chinese oncologists using the Delphi method
Lian Dai1, Shannon Frattaroli2, Jiafu Ji3
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA ldai15@jh.edu.
Background:
Leadership has become an essential component of medical professionalism; yet, China lacks leadership competency models grounded in physicians' clinical realities. This study aimed to develop a context-specific leadership competency model for Chinese oncologists, aligning international frameworks with local healthcare priorities.
Methods:
A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted between June and October 2024. The process began with a preliminary model comprising 6 domains and 30 competency items, derived from a scoping review and the National Health Service Medical Leadership Competency Framework. 40 oncology-related experts evaluated both the six proposed domains and the 30 competency items in round 1 using 9-point Likert scales and open-ended feedback. In round 2, experts screened the suggestions from round 1 through binary (yes/no) evaluations. The resulting refined list was subjected to a final rating in round 3, again using 9-point Likert scales to establish consensus. Quantitative data (mean scores, SD, percentage agreement) and thematic analysis of qualitative feedback were used to iteratively refine the model across rounds.
Results:
Experts reached consensus on a final leadership competency model comprising 6 domains and 40 specific competencies. The highest-rated competencies included integrity, continuous personal development, healthcare quality management, learn and apply new technologies and ensur patient safety. New competencies, not present in the initial model, also emerged-such as clear expression, empathy, influence on the public, familiarity with end-of-life care, health economics evaluation and vision building-capturing the evolving expectations of oncologists as communicators, collaborators and system improvers in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.
Conclusions:
The resulting competency model reflects the multidimensional nature of oncologist leadership, encompassing professionalism, teamwork, service improvement and social responsibility. It offers a practical framework for leadership development and assessment in oncology and provides methodological guidance for building physician leadership competency models in other medical fields.
