Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Multiple Allele Traits

Multiple Allele Traits

Multiple Allele Traits

Multiple Allele Traits

The Concept of Multiple Allelism

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

HPV-Adjusted Feature Screening With FDR Control in Head and Neck Cancer.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026

Same author

Soft Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (SBART) for correlated survey response with non-Gaussian error.

Journal of nonparametric statistics·2026

Same author

Biosensing in Healthcare Applications.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Same author

Prognostic value of FDG-PET SUV changes in cervical cancer following radiation therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2026

Same author

Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Younger and Older C-AYA Cancer Survivors Treated with Anthracyclines: A Single-Center Analysis.

Cancers·2026

Same author

Orientational order induced mode switching at coupled interfaces of a nematic-isotropic free bilayer.

Soft matter·2025

Same journal

Coefficients of Determination for Mixed-Effects Models.

Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics·2026

Same journal

Identifying Relevant Covariates in RNA-seq Analysis by Pseudo-Variable Augmentation.

Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics·2026

Same journal

Assessing Simultaneous Infection with Multiple Pathogens via Group Testing with Imperfect Multiplex Assays.

Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics·2026

Same journal

Improving Crop Model Inference Through Bayesian Melding With Spatially Varying Parameters.

Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics·2025

Same journal

Modeling Complex Spatial Dependencies: Low-Rank Spatially Varying Cross-Covariances With Application to Soil Nutrient Data.

Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics·2025

Same journal

Hierarchical Bayesian Integrated Modeling of Age- and Sex-Structured Wildlife Population Dynamics.

Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

MSPOCK: Alleviating Spatial Confounding in Multivariate Disease Mapping Models.

Douglas R M Azevedo¹, Marcos O Prates¹, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay²

¹Department of Statistics, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.

Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics

|March 24, 2026

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

New Multiple SPOCK (MSPOCK) methodology reduces spatial confounding in disease mapping for multiple cancer types. This statistical approach improves the accuracy of geographical disease tendency assessments, particularly for respiratory cancers in California.

Keywords:

Areal modeling Bayesian Respiratory system cancer SPOCK Shared components Spatial confounding Variance inflation

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Spatial Epidemiology
Public Health

Background:

Disease mapping uses spatial patterns to assess geographical disease tendencies.
Multivariate shared component models analyze multiple disease types but can suffer from spatial confounding.
Spatial confounding leads to misleading interpretations by correlating spatial random effects with fixed effects.

Purpose of the Study:

Introduce Multiple SPOCK (MSPOCK) to address spatial confounding in multiple count data.
Evaluate MSPOCK's effectiveness on synthetic data and real-world respiratory cancer incidence.
Improve the reliability of spatial epidemiological models for public health applications.

Main Methods:

Developed the Multiple SPOCK (MSPOCK) methodology, an extension of SPOCK for multiple count scenarios.
Applied MSPOCK to model spatial patterns of respiratory system cancer incidence in California.
Utilized synthetic data for initial validation and a real-world dataset for illustration.

Main Results:

MSPOCK effectively tackles spatial confounding in multivariate disease mapping.
The method demonstrated a reduction in posterior variance estimates for model parameters.
Model interpretability was preserved following the MSPOCK correction.

Conclusions:

MSPOCK offers a robust solution to spatial confounding in complex disease mapping scenarios.
The methodology enhances the precision and reliability of spatial epidemiological analyses.
MSPOCK is valuable for accurately assessing geographical disease tendencies and informing public health strategies.