Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

358
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
358
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response01:29

Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response

656
Geographic Information System (GIS) technology is essential for risk identification, action prioritization, and resource optimization in critical situations like flooding and earthquakes. By integrating spatial and demographic data, GIS provides a comprehensive framework for emergency response.GIS integrates data layers, like rainfall intensity, topography, elevation profiles, and river levels, to model high-risk flood zones. These layers assess areas susceptible to flooding based on their...
656
Manipulation and Analysis01:21

Manipulation and Analysis

325
GIS manipulation and analysis functions are vital for decision-making and planning. These activities range from data retrieval tasks, such as selecting information based on specific criteria, to advanced analytical techniques that address complex spatial problems.One critical GIS analysis method is overlaying, which combines multiple data layers to examine impacts. For example, overlaying a river-dammed lake boundary with road networks can identify affected infrastructure. Another common...
325
Selected Data About Geographic Locations01:25

Selected Data About Geographic Locations

320
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) rely on two core types of data: spatial data and attribute data.Spatial DataSpatial data defines the physical location of features within a coordinate system, typically expressed in terms of latitude and longitude. It provides precise positioning for elements like roads, rivers, or buildings.Attribute DataAttribute data complements spatial data by adding descriptive information about these features. For example, a road's spatial data includes its start and...
320
Thematic Layering in GIS01:30

Thematic Layering in GIS

407
In the past, planning projects such as schools or public facilities required extensive manual effort to gather and compile data. Information such as property boundaries, soil characteristics, road networks, zoning regulations, and flood zones had to be sourced individually from courthouses, utility providers, and registry offices. Assembling these datasets into a coherent format often took several months, delaying project timelines.The introduction of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)...
407
Levels of Use of a GIS01:29

Levels of Use of a GIS

450
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) operate across three levels of application, each representing an increasing degree of complexity: data management, analysis, and prediction. These levels reflect the expanding functionality and versatility of GIS technology in handling spatial data for diverse purposes.Data ManagementAt its foundational level, GIS serves as a tool for data management, enabling the input, storage, retrieval, and organization of spatial data. This level is often employed in...
450

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Progesterone/estradiol ratio <0.25 on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in prolonged protocols for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology·2017
Same author

Ascorbic acid metabolism during sweet cherry (Prunus avium) fruit development.

PloS one·2017
Same author

Consensus-based recommendations for the management of rapid cognitive decline due to Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2017
Same author

Enzyme-Catalyzed Intramolecular Enantioselective Hydroalkoxylation.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2017
Same author

Risk assessment of aggressive behavior in Chinese patients with schizophrenia by fMRI and <i>COMT</i> gene.

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment·2017
Same author

Vis-NIR spectroscopy with moving-window PLS method applied to rapid analysis of whole blood viscosity.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.7K

A spatially interpretable machine learning framework for urban waterlogging risk mapping in Beijing.

Yi Tang1,2,3

  • 1School of Emergency Technology and Management, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe, China.

Peerj
|March 24, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Urban waterlogging prediction is improved using a novel machine learning framework. The MGWR-XGBoost model enhances spatial interpretability and accuracy for better urban flood risk management.

Keywords:
Emergency managementFloodFlood predictionGEESpatial machine learningSpatial risk mapping

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 25, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Geospatial Analysis
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Urban waterlogging is a growing problem due to urbanization and climate change.
  • Accurate spatial prediction is difficult due to complex factors and varying conditions.
  • Existing methods struggle with nonlinear drivers and spatial heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a spatially interpretable machine learning framework for urban waterlogging prediction.
  • To integrate remote sensing and geospatial data for improved risk assessment.
  • To enhance urban flood resilience through better planning and governance.

Main Methods:

  • A hybrid machine learning framework combining XGBoost and MGWR was developed.
  • Remote sensing and geospatial data (topographic, hydrologic, land cover, proximity) were used.
  • Four algorithms (RF, SVM, KNN, XGBoost) were evaluated, with XGBoost showing initial promise.

Main Results:

  • XGBoost achieved high classification performance (AUC = 0.913).
  • The MGWR-XGBoost hybrid model demonstrated superior probabilistic accuracy (Brier = 0.289) and PR-AUC (0.576).
  • This hybrid approach provided a spatially stable risk map with high specificity (0.734).

Conclusions:

  • The proposed MGWR-XGBoost framework offers high-resolution, spatially explicit waterlogging risk mapping.
  • This approach provides practical support for urban drainage planning and adaptive flood governance.
  • The framework shows potential for improving resilience in data-scarce urban areas globally.