Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 25, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Information Load Predicts Stuttering Events
Haley J Warner1, Nan Bernstein Ratner2, Eric S Jackson1
1Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York.
Purpose:
One potential contributor to the variability of stuttering events is information load, quantified by assessing word predictability based on preceding context. This study investigated whether words with greater information load are more likely to be stuttered using word surprisal as an index while controlling for relevant linguistic variables. We also examined whether this relationship varied with stuttering severity and impact.
Method:
We analyzed spontaneous speech samples from 35 adults who stutter, drawn from the FluencyBank corpus. Word surprisal values were computed using the Generative Pretrained Transformer 2 large language model and analyses controlled for six linguistic predictors of stuttering. We also tested whether clinical measures of stuttering severity and overall impact predicted individuals' sensitivity to surprisal.
Results:
Higher word surprisal significantly increased the likelihood of stuttering, even after controlling for linguistic covariates. However, we found no evidence that stuttering severity or overall impact moderated this relationship.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that words with greater information load are more likely to elicit stuttering during spontaneous speech. This pattern may reflect increased communicative demands associated with high-surprisal words. The absence of a moderating effect of stuttering severity or impact may indicate that individual differences in coping with communicative pressure, rather than clinical severity alone, shape stuttering variability.
More Related Videos
12:43A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
Published on: February 21, 2011
08:36Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
Published on: March 21, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Buffer Effectiveness
The buffer capacity is the amount of acid or base that can be added to a given volume...
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Steps in Outbreak Investigation