Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Modifying the Bank Erosion Hazard Index BEHI Protocol for Rapid Assessment of Streambank Erosion in Northeastern Ohio
Published on: February 13, 2015
Construction of soybean drought indicators based on catastrophic processes and its risk assessment in Northeast China
Xihan Cheng1,2, Hainan Li3, Xining Gao4,5
1College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866, China.
Abstract:
Global warming has intensified the frequency and severity of drought events worldwide, posing a severe threat to agricultural productivity. Northeast China (NEC), a paramount soybean base, is particularly vulnerable to this agrometeorological disaster. The development of soybean drought indicators in NEC, based on comprehensive analysis of disaster processes, would greatly enhance dynamic monitoring and early warning systems for soybean drought. This research has significant implications for regional drought prevention and effective disaster mitigation strategies. In this study, we eliminated the spatial variability of the water surplus and deficit index ([Formula: see text]) and constructed a new soybean water surplus and deficit index ([Formula: see text]). By inverting the historical drought disaster process of soybean drought, we determined the initial discriminant value ([Formula: see text]) of drought. The Kolmogorov‒Smirnov (K-S) test was conducted to determine the optimal distribution model of the sample sequence, and the t-distribution interval estimation method was used to obtain the indicator level threshold. Based on the newly constructed soybean drought indicators, soybean drought risk assessments were carried out. The findings indicated that the drought duration days ([Formula: see text]) estimated based on [Formula: see text], as the dominant factor, and the daily cumulative value ([Formula: see text]) with [Formula: see text], as the auxiliary factor, could be used to more accurately monitor soybean drought in NEC. The accuracy rate of the indicators was 82.4%. There were spatial differences in the probability of each drought level. In terms of the drought risk level, the high-risk area was distributed mainly in the eastern part of Heilongjiang Province, and the low-risk area was distributed mainly in the central and western parts of the East Four Leagues, the western part of Liaoning Province, and a small part of Heilongjiang and Jilin Provinces.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
What is Climate?
