Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition
Published on: July 13, 2019
Multiobjective Simulated Annealing-Based Stopwords Substitution for Rubbish Text Attack
None:
Modern natural language processing (NLP) models exhibit extreme sensitivity toward text adversarial examples, while their opposite insensitivity to text rubbish examples is greatly underestimated. Text rubbish examples usually refer to highly modified sentences that appear nonsensical to humans but can keep the model's prediction unchanged, which are significant in model robustness evaluation, improvement, and interpretation. Existing methods usually design a single objective optimization method to simultaneously maximize the modification rate and the model confidence (MC) with some text modification strategies, such as word deletion and preposition substitution. However, the single objective optimization easily falls into local optima due to the conflicting objectives, and the simple text modification strategies greatly limit the diversity of rubbish examples. To address these problems, we propose a multiobjective simulated annealing-based stopword substitution (MOSA-S2) algorithm with three major merits. First, the MOSA-S2 replaces the input words with meaningless stopwords and employs importance-based composite perturbation to simulate word substitution, enhancing the quality and diversity of the rubbish sample generation. Second, we formulate a multiobjective simulated annealing method to adaptively determine the priority of word replacements, which can escape local optima with a controlled probability and balance multiple objectives via Pareto dominance. Third, we design a grammatically constrained variant to enhance the readability of rubbish text, while maximizing its semantic deviation from the original to mislead human judgment. We evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method on six text datasets by attacking seven popular neural models. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our MOSA-S2 and reveal the fact that modern NLP models may not fully comprehend the textual semantics, as they make the same prediction with even higher confidence for nonsensical text sequences.
Related Concept Videos
Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution: Addition–Elimination (SNAr)
The reaction begins with an attack of the nucleophile on the carbon that holds the leaving group. This results in the delocalization of the π electrons over the ring carbons. The resonance interaction between...
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution: Elimination–Addition
Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Overview
Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions
In 1896, the German chemist Paul Walden discovered that he could interconvert pure enantiomeric (+) and (-) malic acids through a series of reactions. This conversion suggested the involvement of optical inversion during the substitution reaction. Further, in 1930, Sir Christopher Ingold described for the first time two different forms of nucleophilic substitution reactions, which are known as SN1 (nucleophilic substitution unimolecular) and SN2 (nucleophilic substitution...
Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution of Aryldiazonium Salts: Aromatic SN1
In the Sandmeyer reaction, for example, the diazonio group is replaced by a chloro, bromo,...
