dMMR prediction from colorectal cancer histopathology: Leveraging non-tumor and low-magnification regions
Liisa Petäinen1, Juha P Väyrynen2, Jan Böhm3
1Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Address: Mattilanniemi 2, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Background And Objective:
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, posing a substantial burden on healthcare systems. Identifying DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is critical for guiding treatment, yet conventional methods rely on labor-intensive DNA analysis. While deep-learning approaches have shown promise for predicting dMMR from histopathological images, most studies focus exclusively on tumor regions and single-scale representations. This study systematically evaluates the predictive value of tumor and non-tumor regions across multiple magnifications for dMMR prediction from whole-slide images (WSIs).
Methods:
A total of 24 different modeling approaches were evaluated, varying by tissue origin (tumor vs. non-tumor), magnification level (5x and 20x), and tile embedding strategy, including digital pathology foundation models. Tile embeddings were further trained with 1228 WSIs using multiple-instance learning (MIL) based approach. The best-performing configurations were selected for external evaluation. External testing was carried out on two independent cohorts consisting of 1010 and 457 WSIs, respectively.
Results:
Non-tumorous regions demonstrated measurable predictive value, although performance remained lower than that obtained from tumor regions (F1 = 0.896, precision = 0.888, sensitivity = 0.594, specificity = 0.982). Among the nine models selected during internal validation, the top three models-one multi-scale approach and two models trained on 20x tumor regions-achieved F1 scores of 0.870-0.889 with precision of 0.885-0.920, sensitivity of 0.852, and specificity of 0.889-0.926. On external validation, the top three models, all based on foundation-model tile embeddings, achieved F1 scores of 0.916-0.919 on the first cohort and 0.928-0.934 on the second cohort. Across cohorts, specificity remained consistently high (0.964-0.992), while sensitivity ranged from 0.500 to 0.682.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that dMMR status in colorectal cancer can be effectively predicted from histopathological WSIs using MIL-based models, with moderate generalizability across independent cohorts. In addition to confirming the predictive value of tumor regions, the results reveal that non-tumorous tissue also contains detectable predictive signals, suggesting that microenvironmental features may contribute to dMMR-associated histological patterns. Furthermore, the use of foundation model-derived embeddings improved generalizability across datasets. Future work should explore integrating non-tumor tissue features and clinical data to further improve predictive performance.


