Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

06:13
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
1.9K
Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme
Rod Sheaff1, Shokraneh Moghadam2, Laura Hollands3
1Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK r.sheaff@plymouth.ac.uk.
BMJ Open
|March 24, 2026
Summary
This study evaluated the PROGROUP weight management intervention logic model using a realist evaluation. Findings suggest refining delivery and context, not core mechanisms, for broader application of group psychological interventions.
Area of Science:
- Clinical psychology
- Obesity interventions
- Health services research
Background:
- Clinical psychology interventions for obesity are often individualized.
- Healthcare interventions rely on logic models detailing mechanisms, outcomes, and contexts.
- PROGROUP is a novel group-based weight management intervention for severe obesity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the empirical validity of the PROGROUP intervention's logic model.
- To test if PROGROUP's components yield intended outcomes and how.
- To determine if PROGROUP can be practically implemented and how delivery affects the program.
Main Methods:
- Realist evaluation of the PROGROUP logic model using a pre-randomized controlled trial (RCT) feasibility study.
- Elicited the logic model and compared it with feasibility data from NHS sites (2021-2023).
- Revised the logic model based on data, assessing tolerance for delivery variations.
Main Results:
- The initial logic model outlined a sequence of mechanisms for weight loss, including group identity reinforcement.
- Necessary contexts included sufficient population, group retention, suitable location, facilitator training, and support.
- Revisions focused on delivery components and contextual assumptions, with scope to simplify referral mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- The logic model requires refinement in delivery and context, not core therapeutic mechanisms.
- Different professional groups can implement the PROGROUP model.
- Realist evaluation of feasibility studies enhances intervention logic models and identifies conditions for wider use.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
368
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
368
Group Design
11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K

