SOFA-2 versus SOFA-1 for mortality prediction in critically ill patients
Related Experiment Videos
Songjie Bai1, Meiling Huang2, Hui Chen2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Abstract:
We validated the SOFA-2 score against the SOFA-1 score using 65,366 critically ill patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. SOFA-2 demonstrated superior discrimination for ICU mortality (AUROC: 0.829 [95% CI 0.823-0.835] vs. 0.796 [0.789-0.803]) and in-hospital mortality (0.789 [0.783-0.794] vs. 0.763 [0.757-0.769]) compared with SOFA-1. Of 65,366 patients, 40,990 (62.7%) were reclassified to higher scores under SOFA-2. Within each SOFA-1 stratum, those assigned higher SOFA-2 scores consistently demonstrated higher ICU mortality, confirming clinically meaningful reclassification. These findings provide additional external validation supporting the advantages of SOFA-2 for risk stratification in critically ill patients.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Relative Risk
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...