Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Professional perspectives on roles and structural gaps in interprofessional collaboration for suicide prevention: a
Eva Hollenstein1,2, Dolores Angela Castelli Dransart3, Sarah Rajkumar1,2
1Swiss Centre for International Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Introduction:
Suicidal behavior results from a complex interplay of psychiatric, psychosocial, socioeconomic, and structural factors and requires coordinated approaches across care sectors. Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is widely regarded as essential for bridging gaps in care, yet profession-level descriptions of how IPC is organized and where structural bottlenecks occur in suicide prevention remain limited. This study examined how IPC is structured and experienced from the perspective of mental health professionals involved in selected suicide prevention programs in Switzerland.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, psychotherapists, and psychiatric nurses. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, pseudonymized, and analyzed using thematic analysis. A complementary perception-based network visualization depicted reported collaboration patterns.
Results:
Participants described a layered collaboration structure with a clinical core comprising psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychiatric nurses, who assumed central responsibility for crisis assessment, therapeutic interventions, and follow-up care. General practitioners and social workers acted as bridging actors at transition points, while collaboration with actors such as teachers, police officers, and probation officers was described as more uncertain and episodic. IPC was inconsistently organized: some services relied on designated key workers, whereas others managed collaboration ad hoc. Task redistribution, shared training, and information-sharing facilitated collaboration, while limited resources, fragmented documentation systems, and the absence of clearly defined coordination roles remained major barriers.
Discussion:
From a professional perspective, IPC in Swiss suicide prevention is anchored in specialist mental health services but depends on wider cross-sectoral collaboration. Strengthening IPC requires formal coordination roles, interoperable documentation, and durable structures that embed collaboration across care sectors.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...