Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview01:06

Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview

1.1K
Interfacial electrochemical methods focus on the phenomena occurring at the boundary between an electrode and a solution, as opposed to bulk methods that concentrate on the solution's overall properties. These interfacial methods are classified as either static or dynamic based on the presence of a nonzero current in the electrochemical cell and the consistency of analyte concentrations. Static methods, such as potentiometry, measure the cell's potential without any significant current...
1.1K
Potentiometry: Membrane Electrodes01:15

Potentiometry: Membrane Electrodes

2.2K
Membrane electrodes, also known as p-ion electrodes, use membranes that selectively interact with free analyte ions, generating a potential difference across the membrane. The resulting membrane potential, known as the asymmetry potential, is not zero even when analyte concentrations on both sides of the membrane are equal. The membrane's response is typically not selective to a single analyte but proportional to the concentration of all ions in the sample solution capable of interacting at...
2.2K
Processes at Electrodes01:30

Processes at Electrodes

74
The electrode interacts with ions in the electrolyte solution at its interface. The rate of oxidation and reduction depends on the speed at which electrons can transfer through this interface. As ions attach to or leave the electrode surface, the electrode acquires a charge, and an electrical potential forms across the interface, making the process more difficult to reach equilibrium. The charge on the electrode affects the local ion concentrations in the solution, though thermal motion...
74
Electrogravimetric Analysis: Overview01:30

Electrogravimetric Analysis: Overview

910
Electrogravimetric analysis measures the weight of an analyte deposited electrolytically onto a suitable working electrode. This method involves applying a potential to a pre-weighed electrode submerged in a solution, which results in the desired substance being deposited through reduction at the cathode or oxidation at the anode. The electrode's weight is recorded after deposition, and the difference in weight gives the analyte's weight in the solution.
To test the completeness of the...
910

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why Testing Protocols Matter in Electrochemical Methane Oxidation: Insights from IrO <sub><i>x</i></sub> in Acid.

ACS energy letters·2025
Same author

Electrode-Electrolyte Engineering and In Situ Spectroscopy for Urea Electrosynthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Nitrate Co-Reduction.

JACS Au·2025
Same author

In Situ Neutron Reflectometry Reveals the Interfacial Microenvironment Driving Electrochemical Ammonia Synthesis.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

Long-term continuous ammonia electrosynthesis.

Nature·2024
Same author

Tailoring the facet distribution on copper with chloride.

Chemical science·2024
Same author

Calcium-mediated nitrogen reduction for electrochemical ammonia synthesis.

Nature materials·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM

Published on: February 10, 2021

7.6K

The Hidden Complexities of Electrochemically Active Surface Area Measurements.

Jon Bjarke Valbæk Mygind1, Marcel J Rost2, María Escudero-Escribano1,3

  • 1Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.

ACS Energy Letters
|March 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Surface-area normalization in electrochemistry is clarified by distinguishing real surface area from electrochemically active surface area. Normalizing current by active-site count offers a direct measure of intrinsic activity.

More Related Videos

Probing and Mapping Electrode Surfaces in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
15:08

Probing and Mapping Electrode Surfaces in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Published on: September 20, 2012

16.6K
Author Spotlight: Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy
10:59

Author Spotlight: Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy

Published on: May 12, 2023

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM

Published on: February 10, 2021

7.6K
Probing and Mapping Electrode Surfaces in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
15:08

Probing and Mapping Electrode Surfaces in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Published on: September 20, 2012

16.6K
Author Spotlight: Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy
10:59

Author Spotlight: Tracking Electrochemistry on Single Nanoparticles with Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Spectroscopy and Microscopy

Published on: May 12, 2023

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Electrochemistry
  • Surface Science
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Quantitative electrochemistry relies on surface-area normalization for accurate comparisons.
  • Ambiguity in defining the relevant surface area hinders interpretation and reproducibility of electrochemical data.
  • Existing methods often conflate geometric and reactive surface properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between real surface area and electrochemically active surface area.
  • To clarify how different electrochemical techniques probe distinct surface regions.
  • To introduce a formalism for structurally consistent area estimation and propose a new normalization method.

Main Methods:

  • Distinguishing geometric (real surface area) from functional (electrochemically active surface area) definitions.
  • Analyzing double-layer capacitance and adsorption-limited reactions to probe surface properties.
  • Developing a formalism using domain-specific linear combinations of surface contributions.
  • Proposing normalization of current by active-site count.

Main Results:

  • Real surface area reflects geometric roughness, while electrochemically active surface area is reaction-specific.
  • Commonly used reference values for area normalization are highly variable.
  • The proposed formalism enables structurally consistent area estimates.
  • Normalization by active-site count provides a direct measure of intrinsic activity.

Conclusions:

  • Clear definitions of surface area are crucial for electrochemical reproducibility.
  • A novel formalism improves the consistency of surface area estimation.
  • Normalizing current by active-site count is a promising approach for reproducible intrinsic activity measurements.