Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

A Rat Graft Rejection Model of Intestinal Transplantation with Exteriorized Ileostomy for Longitudinal Prognosis Assessment
Published on: June 10, 2025
Development of a Prognostic Model for Prolonged Hospital Stay After Gastrointestinal Perforation Surgery
Yufeng Yang1, Fang Wang1, Zeyuan Li1
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First People's Hospital of Pingjiang, Yueyang, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram integrating clinical and laboratory variables to predict prolonged hospital stay in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) perforation, facilitating early risk stratification and informed clinical decision-making.
Patients And Methods:
A retrospective retrospective single-center study included 164 surgical patients with GI perforation from 2022-2024. Variables encompassed demographics, perforation characteristics, and preoperative/postoperative laboratory markers. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression identified key predictors, followed by multivariate logistic regression to construct a nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results:
Upper GI perforation (OR=2.93, 95% CI:1.23-6.98), smaller perforation diameter (OR=0.48, 95% CI:0.28-0.82), and lower preoperative albumin (OR=1.10 per unit increase, 95% CI:1.03-1.17) independently predicted prolonged hospitalization. The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination (training AUC=0.75; validation AUC=0.79) and calibration. DCA confirmed clinical utility, with net benefit surpassing "treat all" or "treat none" strategies across risk thresholds.
Conclusion:
In summary, we developed and validated a nomogram that effectively identifies patients at high risk for prolonged hospitalization after GI perforation surgery by integrating three routinely available clinical parameters. This tool aids in optimizing resource allocation and personalized perioperative management. Further multicenter validation is warranted to enhance generalizability and incorporate dynamic biomarkers.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

