Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Structure01:19

RNA Structure

8.2K
The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
8.2K
RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

80.5K
Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA): messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three RNA types consist of a...
80.5K
RNA Structure01:23

RNA Structure

29.7K
29.7K
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

10.2K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
10.2K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

36.2K
Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
36.2K
Types of RNA01:23

Types of RNA

73.8K
Overview
Three main types of RNA are involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These RNAs perform diverse functions and can be broadly classified as protein-coding or non-coding RNA. Non-coding RNAs play important roles in the regulation of gene expression in response to developmental and environmental changes. Non-coding RNAs in prokaryotes can be manipulated to develop more effective antibacterial drugs for human or animal use.
RNA...
73.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linker-Driven Sampling of PROTAC-Induced Ternary Complexes.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Correction: Regioselective synthesis of aza-saccharins <i>via</i> anionic [1,4] Fries-type rearrangement of aryl sulfonimidoyl fluorides.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Regioselective synthesis of aza-saccharins <i>via</i> anionic [1,4] Fries-type rearrangement of aryl sulfonimidoyl fluorides.

Chemical science·2026
Same author

Strategic Key Performance Indicators for AI in Lead Optimization.

ChemMedChem·2026
Same author

pH-dependent allosteric remodeling of a bacterial riboswitch couples alkaline activation to metal sensing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Making PLUMED Fly: A Tutorial on Optimizing Performance.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same journal

Probing Charge-Controlled Inter-Domain Flexibility: Integrating Experimental and Coarse-Grained Approaches.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

FragScan: A Quantitative Fragment Scanning Strategy for Rational Drug Discovery.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

GeoPep: A Geometry-Aware Masked Language Model for Protein-Peptide Binding Site Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Interaction Persistence-Based Identification of Key Binding Residues in the Cellular Retinol-Binding Protein 1 Complex.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Tree-Guided Graph Neural Networks with Multilevel Optimization for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

ASO-RASAR: A Read-Across Framework for Predicting Antisense Oligonucleotide Gapmer Activity Across Target Genes.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

5.4K

Exploring Secondary Structure Predictions for RNA-Targeted Drug Discovery: Power and Challenges.

Zhengyue Zhang1, Gaia Dolcetti1,2, Christian Tyrchan1

  • 1Medicinal Chemistry R&I, Discovery Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg 431 83, Sweden.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|March 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

RNA structure prediction tools struggle with complex RNA molecules and ligand binding sites, hindering RNA-targeted drug discovery. Current methods need improvement for accurate druggable site identification in novel RNA sequences.

More Related Videos

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

32.5K
Using In Vitro and In-cell SHAPE to Investigate Small Molecule Induced Pre-mRNA Structural Changes
11:58

Using In Vitro and In-cell SHAPE to Investigate Small Molecule Induced Pre-mRNA Structural Changes

Published on: January 30, 2019

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

5.4K
RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

32.5K
Using In Vitro and In-cell SHAPE to Investigate Small Molecule Induced Pre-mRNA Structural Changes
11:58

Using In Vitro and In-cell SHAPE to Investigate Small Molecule Induced Pre-mRNA Structural Changes

Published on: January 30, 2019

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Ribonucleic acids (RNAs) are crucial regulators in biological processes and emerging drug targets.
  • A gap exists between known RNA sequences and solved structures, impeding RNA-targeted drug discovery.
  • RNA secondary structure prediction can identify potential druggable sites on RNA molecules.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark RNA secondary structure prediction tools.
  • To assess tool performance on a curated dataset of ligand-bound RNA structures.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of predicting RNA secondary structures, especially within ligand binding sites.

Main Methods:

  • Curated a dataset of ligand-bound RNA structures.
  • Benchmarked widely used RNA secondary structure prediction tools.
  • Assessed prediction accuracy for varying RNA lengths, motifs, and ligand binding sites.

Main Results:

  • Most tools perform well on short, simple RNAs but decline for longer RNAs and pseudoknots.
  • Prediction accuracy is significantly reduced within ligand binding sites.
  • Noncanonical base pairs and complex structures in binding sites are poorly recognized.
  • RNA ligand binding sites are inadequately reconstructed by current secondary structure predictions.

Conclusions:

  • Existing RNA secondary structure prediction tools have limitations for RNAs involved in ligand binding.
  • The accuracy gap hinders the integration of these tools into RNA-targeted drug discovery pipelines.
  • Further development is needed to improve prediction accuracy for complex RNA structures and binding sites.