Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Ocrelizumab Discontinuation vs. Continuation After Safety Events: Comparative Insights from MSBase
Aurora Zanghì1, Tim Spelman2, Marzena Fabis-Pedrini3,4
1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
None:
I
Introduction: Ocrelizumab (OCR), a CD20+ B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is a highly effective therapy for Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, safety concerns may lead to treatment discontinuation, raising questions about the clinical consequences of such decisions.
Materials And Methods:
This propensity score-matched study utilized data from the MSBase registry to compare outcomes between patients discontinuing OCR due to safety concerns ("Switchers") and those continuing treatment ("Continuers"). Matching was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance treatment duration and baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to first relapse, 24-48 weeks confirmed disability worsening (CDW), and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA).
Results:
From an initial cohort of 310 Switchers and 1,315 Continuers, 66 patients who experienced at least one safety event and switched from OCR were matched with 66 Continuers. PS-IPTW analyses revealed higher ARR in Switchers (0.08, 95% CI: 0.05-0.14) versus Continuers (0.038, 95% CI: 0.02-0.07; p=0.040). Time to first relapse showed no significant difference (HR=2.23, 95% CI: 0.68-7.28; p=0.183). Trends toward increased CDW24 weeks risk (PS-IPTW HR=2.11, 95% CI: 0.93-4.75; p=0.073), while no significant difference was found at 48 weeks (HR=1.81, 95% CI: 0.83-3.30; p=0.201). PIRA risk showed a trend toward an increase in Switchers (HR=2.45, 95% CI: 0.95-6.29; p=0.063).
Discussion:
In this propensity-score-matched analysis, OCR discontinuation due to safety concerns was associated with increased relapse activity and trends toward greater disability progression. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining therapeutic intensity and systematic monitoring during treatment transitions to mitigate safety risks Conclusion: Further research is needed to develop strategies for effectively managing adverse events to optimize patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
