Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Visualization of ATP Synthase Dimers in Mitochondria by Electron Cryo-tomography
Published on: September 14, 2014
Intercomparison of low-energy electron transport calculations by different Monte Carlo track-structure simulation
Ioanna Kyriakou1, Alexis Papadopoulos1, Ioannis Polopetrakis1
1Medical Physics Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
None:
Objective.To evaluate the uncertainty of physical features of low-energy electron transport in liquid water due to the use of different Monte Carlo track-structure (MCTS) codes.Approach.Five MCTS codes developed specifically for liquid water, namely, Geant4-DNA, PHITS-TS, RITRACKS, NASIC, and PARTRAC are compared and used to calculate the electronic stopping power, pathlength and absorption range, dose-point-kernel, and the frequency-mean (y¯F) and dose-mean (y¯D) lineal energy for primary electron energies from 20 eV to 100 keV. The uncertainty of each calculated quantity is evaluated by the relative standard deviation (RSD) and the maximum relative difference (MRD) among the codes. The medium-to-high-energy (1-100 keV) performance of the codes is benchmarked against the stopping power and range data for liquid water reported in ICRU Report 90.Main Results.For energies above ∼1 keV theRSDis moderate and mostly between 5%-15%, but increases rapidly at lower energies, reaching 20%-100% at sub-100 eV energies. It is noteworthy that theMRDmay well exceed 100% below 100 eV, while remaining sizeable (>20%) even at relatively high energies (10-100 keV). Fairly good agreement between the MCTS codes and the ICRU data for the stopping power (1-100 keV) and range (10-100 keV) in liquid water is found with average deviations between 1%-16%, depending on the code.Significance.The present work reveals significant differences for low-energy electron transport among liquid water MCTS codes, especially below 100 eV. These differences potentially compromise the accuracy of nanoscale simulations where such electrons play a key role. The observed dispersion of results is a consequence of the limitations of the theoretical models used to calculate electron interaction cross sections and the lack of relevant experimental data for their validation and benchmarking. This highlights the need for further development of the physics models used in MCTS codes to reduce the uncertainties associated with low-energy electron transport calculations in liquid water.
More Related Videos
13:56Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
Published on: October 12, 2019
05:37Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
Published on: August 22, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Electron Transport Chains
The ETC is comprised of...
The Electron Transport Chain
Inhibitors of the electron transport chain
Rotenone, a widely used pesticide, prevents electron transfer from Fe-S cluster to ubiquinone or Q...
Electron Transport Chain Components
The Z-Scheme of Electron Transport in Photosynthesis
Electron Behavior
Electrons are negatively charged subatomic particles that are attracted to an orbit around the positively-charged nucleus of an atom. They reside in locations that are associated with energy levels called shells and are further organized into sub-shells and orbitals within each shell.
Electrons Orbit the Nucleus
Electrons are found in specific locations outside of the nucleus. The shell in which an electron resides indicates the general energy level of the electron: those closer to the...
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...