Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

08:46
Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
Published on: September 16, 2021
6.9K
The new vitrification and warming protocols: when rapid is not really rapid.
Alessandro Bartolacci1, Lodovico Parmegiani2, Gabor Vajta3
1Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Reproductive Biomedicine Online
|March 25, 2026
Summary
New cryopreservation protocols shorten exposure times but are mislabeled "rapid." True rapid protocols increase cooling/warming rates, not just solution times. Precise terminology is vital for accurate clinical practice and research.
Area of Science:
- Cryobiology
- Reproductive Medicine
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Novel vitrification and warming protocols aim to reduce cryoprotectant exposure time.
- Current terminology often misrepresents these protocols as 'rapid' or 'ultra-fast.'
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the terminology used for new cryopreservation protocols.
- To distinguish between protocols that shorten solution times and those that increase thermal rates.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of current terminology in cryopreservation literature.
- Comparison of newly developed protocols with historical definitions of 'rapid' and 'ultra-fast' rates.
Main Results:
- New protocols often reduce time in cryoprotectant solutions (CPA) or omit steps, rather than increasing cooling/warming rates.
- The terms 'rapid' and 'ultra-fast' are misleading when applied to protocols that do not alter thermal kinetics.
Conclusions:
- Protocols reducing CPA exposure time should be termed 'shortened protocols,' not 'rapid.'
- Accurate terminology is essential for clear communication, data interpretation, and clinical application in cryopreservation.
- Only protocols increasing physical cooling or warming rates should be labeled 'rapid' or 'ultra-fast.'

