Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Weighting by Income Probabilities as a Novel Approach to Quantifying Differences in the Burden of Cancer by Income: A
Uriel Kim1,2,3,4, Siran Koroukian2,3,4, Johnie Rose2,3,4
1Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Purpose:
Population-based cancer registries are a key data resource for catchment area informatics, but their utility for quantifying differences in cancer burden by socioeconomic status is limited. Here, we describe an approach that estimates cancer incidence along income gradients, leveraging a newly validated method called weighting by income probabilities (WIP).
Methods:
We estimated income-specific colorectal cancer incidence, stratified by sex and race/ethnicity, in a catchment area (Ohio) as a case study. Income-specific numerator data (number of cancer cases per income bracket) were estimated using WIP, whereas denominators (population at risk by income bracket) were derived from US Census data.
Results:
In the case study of the 52,257 patients with invasive colorectal cancer diagnosed in the catchment area of Ohio between 2010 and 2019, lower income was generally associated with higher incidence rates, except in non-Hispanic (NH) White female individuals. The highest incidence was observed in NH Black male individuals at 0-149% of the Federal Poverty Level, with 113.7 cases per 100,000 (95% CI, 99.6 to 129.3) in 2010-2012, compared with 57.8 (95% CI, 54.7 to 61.2) in their NH White counterparts. Sensitivity analyses showed that income-specific incidence statistics were robust to sources of error in numerator and denominator estimation, with incidence estimates varying by no more than 1.98% from the reference estimates.
Conclusion:
The approach described here accurately estimates cancer incidence along income gradients and can be expanded to estimate income-specific survival and mortality. The case study of colorectal cancer in Ohio demonstrates important insights into the burden of cancer by income. These granular income-specific data can enhance our understanding of the relationship between cancer burden and socioeconomic status and inform cancer surveillance, prevention, and control efforts.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Relative Risk
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups