Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
Combined strength and aerobic training vs. aerobic training alone in patients with heart failure: A systematic review
Tasuku Terada1, Tim Kambic2, Takumi Noda3
1Experimental Medicine, Metabolic and Nutritional Physiology Research Group, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; Exercise Physiology and Cardiovascular Health Lab, Division of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa K1Y 4W7, Canada.
Background:
Heart failure (HF), characterized by low exercise tolerance, progressive functional decline, and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL), affects more than 64 million people worldwide. This study assessed the effects of aerobic training (AT) combined with muscle strength training (combined training) on these health measures in patients with HF across the spectrum of ejection fraction (EF).
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and gray literature sources. A meta-analysis compared the effects of combined training and AT alone on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance, muscle strength, HRQoL, and cardiac function in patients with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) and those with preserved EF (HFpEF). Pooled estimates were derived using random-effects models, and pre-specified subgroup analyses examined HF classification, exercise volume and type.
Results:
Of 13,965 studies screened, 15 were included (n = 526, 17% females; HFrEF: n = 466, 89%; and HFpEF: n = 60, 11%). In HFrEF, combined training increased CRF (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.10‒0.71, p = 0.01, small-to-medium effect), 6MWT distance (mean difference (MD) = 48.4 m, 95%CI: 35.6‒61.0 m, p < 0.001), and upper body muscle strength (MD = 8.3 kg, 95%CI: 3.2 ‒13.4 kg, p = 0.02) more than AT alone. When matched for exercise session duration, combined training increased CRF more than AT alone. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) combined with muscle strength training also showed a greater increase in CRF compared to HIIT alone. There were no differences in HRQoL or cardiac function.
Conclusion:
In predominantly male patients with HFrEF, combined training yielded greater improvements in CRF, 6MWT distance, and upper body strength than AT alone. Replacing part of aerobic training with muscle strength training may be an effective strategy to further enhance CRF in HFrEF. Also, HIIT may be combined with muscle strength training to induced further increases in CRF. Further evidence is needed to clarify the effects of combined training in HFpEF.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

