Association between lipoprotein(a) and peri-procedural ischemic stroke in intracranial artery stenting: a

Fan Qingyu1, Zhan Shuqin1, Li Fangcun1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Neurological Research
|March 26, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Preoperative Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels independently predict peri-procedural ischemic stroke (PPIS) after intracranial stenting. Elevated Lp(a) increases PPIS risk, aiding in better patient stratification.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Cardiology
  • Vascular Medicine

Background:

  • Peri-procedural ischemic stroke (PPIS) is a significant complication of intracranial stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS).
  • Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a known risk factor for long-term vascular events, but its predictive role for acute, procedure-specific risks like PPIS remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if preoperative Lp(a) independently predicts PPIS in patients undergoing intracranial stenting.
  • To characterize the dose-response relationship between Lp(a) levels and PPIS risk.
  • To evaluate the incremental value of Lp(a) in stratifying risk for PPIS.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients with severe symptomatic ICAS undergoing stenting.
  • Stratification of patients based on preoperative Lp(a) levels (cutoff: 30 mg/dL).
  • Multivariate logistic regression, ROC analysis, and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to assess Lp(a)'s predictive value.

Main Results:

  • PPIS occurred in 7.7% of patients, with a higher incidence in the high Lp(a) group (14.6% vs. 4.4%).
  • Elevated preoperative Lp(a) was an independent predictor of PPIS (aOR=2.82), even after adjusting for stenosis rate and hyperglycemia.
  • Incorporating Lp(a) into risk models improved predictive accuracy (AUC increased from 0.727 to 0.766, NRI=0.421).

Conclusions:

  • Preoperative Lp(a) is an independent predictor of PPIS following intracranial stenting, demonstrating a dose-response relationship.
  • Lp(a) provides valuable information for risk stratification in patients undergoing ICAS stenting.
  • Further multicenter validation is recommended due to the single-center design and limited event numbers.
Abstract