Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

654
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
654
Bias01:22

Bias

7.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.9K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

472
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
472
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the relationship between indirect measures of Black versus White racial attitudes and discriminatory outcomes: An adversarial collaboration using a sample of White Americans.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

The mental representation of ingroup and outgroup faces.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Moderators of test-retest reliability in implicit and explicit attitudes.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Retraction Note: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Nonlinear relationships between eye gaze and recognition accuracy for ethnic ingroup and outgroup faces.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Local Legislation is Associated With Regional Transgender Attitudes.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2023
Same journal

Intergroup Contact and Belonging Among Ethiopian Jews in Ethiopia.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

A Taxonomy of Data Synthesis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

When and Why Beliefs About the Causes of a Policy Problem Predict Policy Support.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Prospects of Downward Mobility Cause Status Anxiety and Life Dissatisfaction.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Fluency as a Cue to Authenticity.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Just Like My CEO: When Perceived Similarity Makes Pay Inequality Acceptable.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Can a Single Cue Reduce Bias?

Balbir Singh1, Jordan R Axt2, Joshua Correll3

  • 1Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|March 26, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simplifying information by reducing decision cues boosts accuracy but doesn't eliminate bias. Even with fewer, clearer cues, decision-making may still exhibit social favoritism.

Keywords:
BiasDiscriminationJudgment Bias TaskSocial judgment

More Related Videos

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.9K
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.9K
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Companies often simplify information to improve human decision-making and reduce bias.
  • Existing research indicates that multiple cues can lead to biased decisions as individuals selectively weigh information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether reducing the number and ambiguity of decision-relevant cues decreases bias in selection decisions.
  • To determine if increased accuracy, resulting from simplified information, correlates with reduced decision bias.

Main Methods:

  • Three studies were conducted where participants made selection decisions.
  • The number and ambiguity of qualifications (decision cues) were manipulated across studies.
  • Accuracy and bias (social favoritism) were measured in response to information simplification.

Main Results:

  • Reducing the number of qualifications from multiple to a single cue increased decision accuracy.
  • However, this increase in accuracy did not significantly reduce decision bias or social favoritism.
  • Modifying the format or reducing the ambiguity of a single cue also improved accuracy without significantly reducing bias.

Conclusions:

  • Simplifying information by decreasing the number of cues enhances decision accuracy.
  • Reducing cue quantity or ambiguity does not inherently reduce decision bias, including social favoritism.
  • Further research is needed to understand how to effectively mitigate bias in simplified decision environments.