Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
The Utility of Measures of Physical Behavior, Function, and Fitness as Predictors of Mortality
Yuhe Wang1,2, Cameron Razieh1,3, Alex V Rowlands1,2
1Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK.
Objective:
To assess whether simple measures of lifestyle and physical health improve mortality risk prediction in healthy adults and those living with health conditions when added to or substituted for traditional risk factors.
Patients And Methods:
Data were from the UK Biobank (N=407,569; median age, 58 years; May 1, 2006 to September 30, 2022), stratified by sex and health status. The base model included the following: age, smoking status, body mass index, systolic blood pressure (SBP), total cholesterol-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (CHR), and material deprivation. Five simple physical measures (leisure time physical activity; sleep duration; resting heart rate; maximum handgrip strength; and walking pace [WP]) were added to or substituted for traditional risk factors (ie, SBP and CHR), both individually and combined. Model performance was assessed using the C-index and net reclassification index (NRI).
Results:
Replacing both CHR and SBP with all physical measures improved C-index of 0.022 (95% CI, 0.018-0.026) and NRI by 9.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-12.8%) in women living with a health condition. Corresponding values for men were as follows: C-index: 0.024 (95% CI, 0.020-0.027); NRI: 19.0% (95% CI, 16.6%-21.4%). The improvement of C-index was smaller in healthy women (0.006; 95% CI, 0.004-0.007) and men (0.007; 95% CI, 0.006-0.009). WP alone improved risk prediction and classification when replacing CHR and SBP in individuals with a health condition, with a C-index improvement of 0.015 (95% CI, 0.012-0.019) and an NRI of 11.0% (95% CI, 7.4%-14.6%) in women and 0.014 (95% CI, 0.012-0.017) and 14.0% (95% CI, 11.5%-16.5%) in men, respectively.
Conclusion:
Measures of lifestyle and physical health improve mortality prediction and classification and could be used as potential substitutes for traditional clinical factors, particularly in populations with prevalent illness. WP was the strongest individual predictor.
More Related Videos
09:18Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Published on: January 12, 2019
02:47Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
Published on: May 12, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Applications of Life Tables
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...