Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
The measurement of harm reduction goals and outcomes for substance use: Current state and future directions
Frank J Schwebel1, Dylan K Richards2, Megan Kirouac1
1Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, And Addictions (CASAA), University of New Mexico.
Abstract:
Traditionally, substance use treatment and research have prioritized abstinence as the primary goal or outcome while overlooking the broader spectrum of harm reduction goals and outcomes. However, emerging evidence suggests that substance use itself is not necessarily the only nor the best indicator of treatment success, and other harm reduction goals and outcomes are increasingly accepted in treatment and research. This paper reviews existing harm reduction-oriented measures and identifies gaps in current assessment approaches. Key measures discussed include those assessing substance-related harms (e.g., Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, Drug Abuse Screening Test), consumption-based metrics (e.g., Timeline Follow-Back), and quality of life indicators. We also highlight measures of protective behavioral strategies, harm reduction motives, harm reduction self-efficacy, and goal attainment scaling as important but underutilized approaches to assessing harm reduction outcomes. Given that harm reduction goals vary by individual and may evolve over time, we argue for the development of more reliable and valid measures that capture diverse treatment outcomes. Additionally, we emphasize the need to involve people with lived experience in all stages of the measure development process to ensure their relevance and applicability. Future research should focus on refining existing measures, expanding definitions of success in substance use treatment, and more thoroughly integrating harm reduction into clinical and research settings. By shifting the focus beyond abstinence alone, researchers and clinicians can better align treatment goals with patients' needs and goals, enhance intervention effectiveness, and promote more inclusive and individualized pathways to recovery.
More Related Videos
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Drug Dependence
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena