Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
The challenge of white-coat hypertension screening
Christian S Dal Pont1, Rodrigo Bezerra1,2, Weimar S Barroso3
1Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Background:
The 2025 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology blood pressure guideline (2025-AHA/ACC-BP guideline) recommends out-of-office blood pressure (BP) assessment to exclude white-coat hypertension (WCH) in untreated and white-coat effect (WCE) in treated individuals among adults with office BP (OBP) ranging between 130/80-<160/100 mmHg, but its real-world diagnostic performance remains incompletely characterized.
Methods:
We evaluated the performance of 2025-AHA/ACC-BP guideline-recommended OBP thresholds for screening WCH/WCE among 147,404 Brazilian adults with OBP ≥ 130/80mmHg, including 86,692 untreated (29.7% WCH) and 46,229 treated (29.2% WCE) individuals who underwent HBPM and 10,475 untreated (46.2% WCH) and 4,008 treated (49.4% WCE) individuals who underwent ABPM. OBP ranges combining ≥130/80mmHg with progressively lower upper limits (<160/100, <150/95, <150/90, and <140/90 mmHg) were evaluated. The performance of OBP intervals to detect WCH/WCE was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results:
In the HBPM cohort, OBP ≥ 130/80-<160/100 mmHg yielded sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 95%, 25%, and 0.600 in untreated and 94%, 28%, and 0.610 in treated participants. Narrower OBP ranges increased AUCs, peaking at OBP ≥ 130/80-<150/90 mmHg (0.682 and 0.677 in untreated and treated, respectively). In the ABPM cohort, the corresponding values for OBP ≥ 130/80-<160/100 mmHg were 94%, 34%, and 0.641 (untreated) and 91%, 41%, and 0.662 (treated), AUC's were highest at OBP ≥130/80-<150/90 mmHg (0.722 in both groups).
Conclusions:
This real-world analysis shows that OBP thresholds recommended by the 2025-AHA/ACC-BP guideline for WCH/WCE screening are highly sensitive but have low specificity, resulting in referral of the majority of patients for out-of-office BP assessment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:

