Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 27, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Get the unbalance right: asymmetric transfer effects in cognitive offloading
Irene Florean1, Marta Stragà1, Timo Mäntylä2
1Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via Weiss 2, 34128, Trieste, TS, Italy.
Cognitive offloading aids immediate task performance but can hinder subsequent planning when the opportunity to offload is removed. This suggests strategy switching costs are higher when moving from offloaded to non-offloaded planning.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Decision Making
Background:
- Cognitive offloading, using external tools to reduce mental effort, improves immediate performance but can impair memory for the offloaded information.
- The impact of cognitive offloading on subsequent performance, particularly in complex tasks like planning, remains under-explored.
- Understanding transfer effects is crucial for designing effective cognitive support systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the transfer-related consequences of cognitive offloading on subsequent planning performance.
- To examine how the opportunity to offload influences strategy adoption and performance when environmental conditions change.
- To determine the costs associated with transitioning between offloaded and non-offloaded planning strategies.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments employed a planning task requiring participants to find the shortest route under specific constraints.
- Transfer designs assessed performance changes when the opportunity to offload was manipulated (present/absent) after initial training.
- Experiment 1 manipulated pen use for offloading; Experiment 2 used embedded visual aids to support offloading strategies.
Main Results:
- The negative impact of removing the opportunity to offload was greater than the positive impact of introducing it.
- Transitioning from offloaded to non-offloaded planning incurred higher strategy switching costs and reconfiguration challenges.
- Cognitive offloading in complex tasks influences strategy use, with subsequent cognitive consequences when task conditions change.
Conclusions:
- The opportunity to cognitively offload can alter strategy use, leading to significant performance costs when that opportunity is removed.
- Switching from intuitive visual planning to demanding incremental planning strategies incurs substantial cognitive costs.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering strategy transfer effects in the design and implementation of cognitive support tools.
More Related Videos
10:09Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
Published on: September 22, 2014
07:08Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Language and Cognition
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Nonconscious Mimicry
Actor-Observer Effect