Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026
Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Rescue Stenting for Large-Vessel Occlusion due to Underlying Intracranial
Francesco Marino1, Guglielmo Pero2, Santo R Borzì2
1From the Department of Neuroradiology (F.M., G.P., S.R.B., M.T., M.C., G.C., M.A.P., C.C.), Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, 95126, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery (G.P., C.C.), Kore University, Enna, 94019, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery (B.P.), University Hospital St. Pölten - NOE LGA, Karl Landsteiner University, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100, St. Pölten, Austria and University Multi-profile Hospital for active treatment and Emergency Medicine N. I. Pirogov (T.S.), Endovascular neurosurgery, 1606, Sofia, Bulgaria. f.marino997@gmail.com.
Insights
Rescue stenting improves reperfusion and functional independence in large-vessel occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. However, mortality benefits remain uncertain, and more randomized data are needed to confirm these findings.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Large-vessel occlusion (LVO) from intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) often results in poor reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy.
- Rescue intracranial stenting is a growing strategy, but its efficacy and safety profile require further clarification.
- Previous reviews have pooled diverse strategies, limiting specific insights into stenting for ICAS-LVO.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rescue stenting in patients with ICAS-LVO.
- To quantify outcomes such as functional independence, reperfusion rates, and complications associated with rescue stenting.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was conducted on eight comparative studies published between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2025.
- Included were 1,901 patients with ICAS-LVO undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, comparing rescue stenting (654 patients) versus a no-stent strategy (1,247 patients).
- Outcomes assessed included 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2), successful reperfusion (TICI ≥2b), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality.
Main Results:
- Rescue stenting was linked to significantly higher rates of 90-day functional independence (OR 1.61) and successful reperfusion (OR 2.47).
- No significant increase in mortality (OR 0.74) or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 1.25) was observed.
- Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences between self-expanding and balloon-mounted stents regarding functional or safety outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Rescue stenting in ICAS-LVO is associated with improved reperfusion and functional outcomes without a significant rise in symptomatic hemorrhage.
- The evidence quality is low due to study limitations (observational nature, potential bias, heterogeneity).
- Further randomized controlled trials are essential to establish causality and guide optimal patient selection for rescue stenting.
Background:
Large-vessel occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis often leads to failed or unstable reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy. Rescue intracranial stenting is increasingly used, but its benefit-to-risk profile remains unclear. Prior systematic reviews have frequently pooled different rescue strategies and heterogeneous cohorts, limiting inference on the independent risk-benefit profile of stenting in ICAS-LVO.
Purpose:
To quantify the efficacy and safety of rescue stenting in ICAS-LVO.
Data Sources:
Comparative studies evaluating permanent rescue stenting for ICAS-LVO during mechanical thrombectomy from January 1, 2020, through October 31, 2025, were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Web of Science.
Study Selection:
Eight comparative studies encompassing 1,901 patients with confirmed large-vessel occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (654 treated with rescue stenting and 1,247 managed with a no-stent strategy) were included.
Data Analysis:
We evaluated 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2), successful reperfusion (TICI ≥2b), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality; when available, we also extracted data by stent type. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.
Data Synthesis:
Eight studies (1901 patients; 654 stented, 1247 controls) were included. Rescue stenting was associated with higher odds of 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2) (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.13-2.29) and successful reperfusion (TICI ≥2b) (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.55-3.93). Mortality was not significantly different (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.45-1.22), and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was not significantly increased (OR 1.25; 95% CI 0.81-1.95). In stent-type subgroup analyses, no apparent differences were observed between self-expanding and balloon-mounted stents for functional or safety outcomes.
Limitations:
Evidence is limited by the small number of included studies and their observational nature, with potential confounding by indication and selection bias; heterogeneity was moderate for the functional outcome and substantial for mortality; symptomatic haemorrhage definitions varied, and event counts were limited.
Conclusions:
In large-vessel occlusion due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, rescue stenting is associated with higher reperfusion rates and improved 90-day functional outcomes without a statistically significant increase in symptomatic haemorrhage, while any mortality benefit remains uncertain. The certainty of the evidence is low, and randomized data are needed to confirm causality and optimize patient selection.
More Related Videos
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
13:18Optimization of the Longa Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Method for Complete Reperfusion
Published on: November 22, 2024
