Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Proposal of a Cervical Sagittal Classification System to Guide Surgical Treatment for Adult Cervical Deformity: A
Zeeshan M Sardar1, Roy Miller1, Justin L Reyes1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY.
Study Design:
Retrospective analysis.
Objective:
To describe normative cervical sagittal alignment and to propose a classification system to guide clinical assessment and surgical planning.
Background Context:
Optimizing alignment is a key goal of adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery. The purpose of this study was to understand normative alignment utilizing an asymptomatic adult cohort and to formulate a classification system that would help identify the spinal regions contributing to the cervical deformity.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 468 asymptomatic adults (18-80 yr) from five countries (USA, France, Japan, Singapore, and Tunisia) formed the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS). The C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope (T1S), and C2-C7 cervical sagittal angle (CSA; positive=kyphosis, negative=lordosis), and other sagittal parameters were measured. Linear regression was utilized to correlate the C2-C7 CSA to the T1 slope. Thresholds for the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope were defined as mean+2 SD. Groups were compared using ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test. χ 2 analysis was used for categorical comparisons.
Results:
Mean values for C2-C7 cervical sagittal angle were -0.4° (12.7°), T1 slope was 23.0° (7.9°), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis was 19.1 (9.8). The highest mean segmental Cobb angle was 3.2° (4.8), which was at the C4-C5 segment. The T1S-CSA mismatch was 22.6 (9.4) with an interquartile range of 9.5 to 35.7. Linear regression yielded a formula CSA=-1.1(T1S) + 24.5 ( R2 =0.45, P <.0001) which was simplified to CSA=25-T1S. Four alignment types (1A/1B/2/4) were observed in the MEANS cohort. Type 3 alignment was absent. Types 1A, 1B, 2, and 4 alignment showed significant differences across cervical, thoracic, and global sagittal parameters.
Conclusion:
We define normative cervical alignment utilizing the MEANS cohort and propose a classification system to identify the spinal region driving the cervical deformity. Types 1A-B represent well-compensated alignment. Types 2 and 3 were considered to have deformities in the cervical spine and thoracolumbar spine, respectively. Type 4 spines have a combined deformity. This can help guide surgeons to determine the appropriate region that should be addressed with surgery.
Related Concept Videos
01:16Vertebral Column: Regions and Curvature
Regions of the Vertebral Column
In an adult, the spine is subdivided into five regions: the cervical, the thoracic, the lumbar, the sacral, and the coccygeal region. The spine initially develops as a series of 33 vertebrae; after 20 years of age, the nine bones in the sacral region, five sacral, and four coccygeal bones fuse to form...
01:09Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
01:09Overview of the Axial Skeleton
The axial skeleton of the...
01:30General Structure of a Vertebra
01:18Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
01:28Articulations of the Vertebral Column