Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

Estimation of Nephron Number in Whole Kidney using the Acid Maceration Method
Published on: May 22, 2019
Integrating nephron number into risk stratification for IgA nephropathy
Yuya Yamaguchi1, Takaya Sasaki1, Nobuo Tsuboi2
1Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
The International IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) prediction tool provides reliable risk estimates for kidney outcomes using clinical and histopathological variables. However, additional structural biomarkers may further improve prognostic precision. This study investigated whether incorporating estimated nephron number enhances the predictive performance of the International IgAN prediction tool.
Methods:
We conducted a post hoc analysis of 218 adult patients with primary IgAN diagnosed with native kidney biopsy between 2007 and 2017. Nephron number per kidney was estimated by multiplying estimated kidney cortical volume derived from unenhanced computed tomography by nonsclerotic glomerular density obtained from kidney biopsy specimens. The 5 year risk of a composite kidney outcome (≥ 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] or initiation of kidney replacement therapy) was calculated using the International IgAN prediction tool. Discrimination and reclassification were assessed using Harrell's C statistics, the category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI), and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).
Results:
The cohort had a mean age of 42.6 years, 61.5% were male, and the mean eGFR was 60.7 mL/min/1.73 m2. The mean estimated nephron number was 6.8 × 105 per kidney. During the 5 year follow-up, 25 patients (11.5%) reached the composite outcome. The original model showed excellent discrimination (C statistics 0.855), which improved to 0.867 after adding nephron number. The NRI significantly improved (0.544, P = 0.011), while the IDI showed a non-significant trend (P = 0.46).
Conclusions:
Estimated nephron number provides additive prognostic value beyond established clinical and pathological predictors in patients with IgAN, supporting its role as a complementary biomarker in risk stratification.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration

