Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Treating Knee Osteoarthritis with Tuina - A New Perspective
Published on: January 12, 2024
Treatment patterns of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a
Jong Gyun Ahn1,2, Min-Taek Lee3, Daye Lee4
1Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
This study analyzed juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment patterns in Korea, finding etanercept most common among biologic DMARDs. Understanding these real-world trends aids optimizing care for children with JIA.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Pediatrics
- Real-world evidence
Background:
- Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a common childhood chronic arthritis with unknown etiology.
- Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) improve outcomes in severe JIA but face challenges due to disease heterogeneity.
- Understanding novel therapy patterns is crucial for optimizing JIA management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the real-world treatment patterns of bDMARDs in Korean JIA patients.
- To compare treatment strategies between bDMARD and non-bDMARD groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of Korean national claims data (2007-2019).
- Classification of JIA patients into bDMARD and non-bDMARD groups.
- Comparison of treatment patterns, including drug choices and discontinuation rates.
Main Results:
- 31.3% of 1,728 JIA patients received bDMARDs; 15.5% discontinued.
- Etanercept (69.7%) was the most frequent first bDMARD, followed by adalimumab and tocilizumab.
- Conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were used by 68.7% of the non-bDMARD group, with higher discontinuation rates (46.6%).
Conclusions:
- This study provides the first comprehensive profile of JIA treatment patterns in Korea using population-based claims data.
- Findings enhance understanding of real-world treatment trends for JIA.
- The results can aid clinical decision-making in managing JIA.
Objective:
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic arthritis in children, with an unknown cause and prolonged disease course. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have improved outcomes in severe or refractory cases, but challenges remain due to disease heterogeneity and long-term management needs. Understanding treatment patterns of novel therapies is essential for optimizing care. This study aimed to investigate bDMARD treatment patterns in JIA patients using a real-world database.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted using Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) national claims data from 2007 to 2019. JIA patients were classified into bDMARDs and non-bDMARDs groups, with treatment patterns compared.
Results:
Among 1,728 JIA patients, 31.3% (n=541) received bDMARDs, with 15.5% (n=84) discontinuing treatment. The median time from diagnosis to first bDMARD was 36.7 (9.7~58.1) months, with a median treatment duration of 28.1 (11.5~54.4) months and follow-up of 24.3 (7.7~43.7) months post-discontinuation. In the non-bDMARDs group (68.7%, n=1,187), 68.7% (n=815) used conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), with a 46.6% (n=380) discontinuation rate. Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine were the most prescribed csDMARDs. Etanercept (69.7%) was the most common first bDMARD, followed by adalimumab (19.0%) and tocilizumab (7.6%), with 14.8% switching to a second biologic. Discontinuation rates of csDMARDs were higher in the non-bDMARDs group (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
This is the first comprehensive study profiling the treatment patterns of Korean patients with JIA using population-based claims data. The findings enhance understanding of real-world treatment trends, aiding clinical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management

