Comparison of Four Assays That Measure Antibodies to Ebola Virus Glycoprotein

The accurate measurement of Ebola virus (EBOV)-specific antibody responses is crucial to assessing immunity induced by EBOV infection or vaccination. For this purpose, the Filovirus Animal Nonclinical Group (FANG) anti-EBOV glycoprotein (GP_1,2) ELISA is considered the "gold-standard". However, it has limitations such as high repeat-rates and variability, and low throughput. Here, we describe two new alternative assays: a Single-Molecule Assay Planar EBOV GP_1,2 ELISA and a multiplexed EBOV GP_1,2, EBOV nucleoprotein, and EBOV Viral Protein 40 Luminex assay, and compare these with two versions of the FANG ELISA. Samples were selected from participants receiving vaccine or placebo in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of two EBOV vaccines (PREVAIL 1), and a longitudinal cohort study of Ebola virus disease (EVD) survivors and their close contacts (PREVAIL 3). All four assays were concordant in their measurements of anti-EBOV GP_1,2-specific immunoglobulin G responses, allowing for the determination of conversion equations for antibody measurements across assays. In addition, all four showed a similar ability to distinguish vaccine recipients from placebo recipients and EVD survivors from their close contacts. Compared to the FANG assays, the Quanterix and Luminex assays had lower variability, lower repeat rates, and higher throughput, making them good alternatives for future studies.